Date: 29 Aug 2005
<scribe> Scribe: Pete Wenzel
Mark has sent a reminder to those who have not yet registered for the
September F2F. Bob has logistical changes that will be mailed to
Minutes accepted without objection.
WSDL document review
Jonathan describes schema annotations that may be helpful in referencing a
web service object. Those who are not also members of WSD WG and involved
in the design process are especially welcome to review. Syntax is good
for both WSDL 1.1 and 2.0, but the features are described only in terms
MarkN requests reviewers. Suggest having 4 people, one for each part.
Due by Sept 8.
DavidH: Already reviewing core; will take that.
Tony: Will review primer.
Katy: SOAP 1.1 Binding document, plus SOAP 1.2 Binding (Section 5)
MarcG: Remainder of Adjuncts document (MEPs, HTTP Binding).
MarkN: Reviewers are expected to identify areas of relevance for
discussion by this WG, not necessarily a complete list of problems.
Will discuss on 9/12 call, try to have results to WSD WG that week.
Arun reviews his email discussing the issue and alternatives:
and expresses a preference for option #2.
Anish: Agree with Jonathan that we need to discuss client messages,
not server behavior. Don't like 1; 2 & 4 seem reasonable.
Katy: Preference for option 4; action 2 is overloading wsa:Action.
DavidH: Some of these options are not compatible with servers who don't
know about WSA.
Umit: Difference between 2 & 4 is whether or not we infer or specify
the use of WSA.
Jonathan: Can we replace "honored" with "understood", as in
Jonathan agrees to take an action to produce a new proposal, reflecting
the discussion just held.
Jonathan reviews his message:
Proposal is to close issue with option #1 in this email.
No one wishes to discuss further; issue is closed as proposed without
MarkN: Propose to categorize this as editorial, bring it to editors'
MarcH: Helpful to the editorial process if it is assigned an issue number.
MarkN: Will open and close an issue for this.
No objections to this disposition.
<scribe> Closed (as i063?).
Arun introduces his issue and proposed solution.
Jonathan: This is really 2 issues; one a typo, one a simplification.
Proposal: Replace wsa:ActionMismatch with wsa:ProblemAction.
Opened new issue proposing to remove wsa:ProblemHeader and
wsa: ProblemHeaderQName in this case. ??
- testable features list
- expressions of interest in testing TF
No volunteers yet to form a TF.
Arun walks through his list of testable features:
Hugo: Need to add corner cases to this list.
MarkN: Need some offline discussion to move this forward.
Anish agrees to offer guidance as well. Suggests adding markers to
the spec to identify/reference features.
Proposal 1: <http://www.w3.org/mid/41ED99B7.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Anish reviews the proposal.
Jonathan: Problem: we removed the distinction between physical and
Anish will update the proposal, possibly positioning it as guidance,
and discuss use cases.
Proposal 1: <http://www.w3.org/mid/425A1F2F.email@example.com>
Proposal 2: <http://www.w3.org/mid/425A1F2F.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Proposal 3: <http://www.w3.org/mid/425A1F2F.email@example.com>
Proposal 4: <http://www.w3.org/mid/425A1F2F.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Proposal 5: <http://www.w3.org/mid/425A1F2F.email@example.com>
MarkN: Review proposal 6, will vote at next meeting.
Reminder to review WSDL document. Will likely take CR vote at F2F.
Meeting adjourned at 2:58pm US-Pacific.