ISSUE-203: typos in XSD

typos in XSD

State:

CLOSED

Product:

MMIArchLLC

Raised by:

James Barnett

Opened on:

2012-06-25

Description:

From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:23:20 +0200
Message-ID: <1337070200.2833.11.camel@homer-simpson.localdomain>
To: www-multimodal@w3.org

Hey there,
currently, I am about to implement a generic hook of a voice modality
component for JVoiceXML. This hook will open source and will be
available with the next release of my open source voice browser.

I started with the XSD definitions that are given in appendix C of
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-mmi-arch-20120112/

I know that the comments are no longer welcome but there are some
upper-lower case confusions in these XSD files. I assume that the
element "statusInfo" defined in mmi-elements.xsd should be lower case,
but some references are upper case. Occurences are in
- C10 StartResponse.xsd
- C13 CancelResponse.xsd
- C15 PauseResponse.xsd
- C17 ResumeResponse.xsd
- C22 StatusResponse.xsd

Although these schemas are only informative they should be corrected. It
is only minimal effort and will help to avoid further confusion.

Thanks,
Dirk

From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 09:28:36 +0200
Message-ID: <1337585316.2773.7.camel@homer-simpson.localdomain>
To: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
Cc: www-multimodal@w3.org

Hey Debbie,

thanks for the quick answer.

I had a look at the submission process for implementation reports. I
understand that you have some interest in having more experiences with
the specification. I also saw that the deadline for submitting a
multimodal implementation report was on 29 February 2012 (taken from
http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/2012/mmi-arch-irp/Overview.html#participate)
So that deadline was already extended?

For JVoiceXML I will not be going the whole way but implement only a
voice modality component. Will that be sufficient? I assume that I will
have to fulfil at least the "common test assertions" and the
"MC-specific test assertions" as described in
http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/2012/mmi-arch-irp/Overview.html#participate

Will I be linked somewhere (to get something back at least)?

Best,
Dirk

Am Dienstag, den 15.05.2012, 18:24 -0400 schrieb Deborah Dahl:
> Hello Dirk,
> Thanks for your comments on the MMI Architecture draft. Even though we're in the Candidate Recommendation period, we can fix typos like this in the next draft, which will be a Proposed Recommendation.
> If you're close to completing your implementation of the MMI Architecture, you might want to consider submitting an implementation report. These reports help support the spec by demonstrating broad interest, and also help us understand what features people are most interested in.
> The process is described in http://www.w3.org/TR/mmi-arch/.
> Regards,
> Debbie Dahl
> MMI Working Group Chair

DISPOSITION=ACCEPTED
ACCEPTANCE=IMPLICIT

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: updated arch spec and DoC (from ashimura@w3.org on 2012-07-17)
2. updated arch spec and DoC (from Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com on 2012-07-09)
3. ISSUE-203: typos in XSD [MMIArchLLC] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-06-25)

Related notes:

Display change log