ISSUE-160: Represent an emotion's intensity but not it's nature

Represent an emotion's intensity but not it's nature

State:
CLOSED
Product:
EmotionML
Raised by:
Marc Schröder
Opened on:
2010-10-18
Description:
Roddy: it does make sense to talk about an emotion's intensity without
its nature.

This is in contrast to the group's decision on ISSUE-72. Also it seems to run against the ideas in ISSUE-158 to abolish <intensity>.

One possible solution would be to define a dimension vocabulary including the "intensity" dimension.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Fwd: [emo] minutes 10 - Nov-2010 (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-11-23)
  2. ISSUE-160: Represent an emotion's intensity but not it's nature [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-10-18)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 160.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:50:51 ted Exp $