ISSUE-72: Require meaningful minimal emotion representation
Require meaningful minimal emotion representation
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EmotionML
- Raised by:
- Marc Schröder
- Opened on:
- 2009-11-02
- Description:
- http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/emotionml/#ISSUE-72
Maybe it should be required that at least one of <category>, <dimensions>, <appraisals> and <action-tendencies> MUST be present? Otherwise it is possible not to say anything about the emotion as such. Or should <intensity> be included in this list? Does it make sense to state the intensity of an emotion but not its nature? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-160: Represent an emotion's intensity but not it's nature [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-10-18)
- [emo] telco minutes (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2010-08-18)
- [emo] minutes from EmotionML call - 28 April 2010 (from paolo.baggia@loquendo.com on 2010-04-28)
- ISSUE-72 (EMO-3): Require meaningful minimal emotion representation [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-11-02)
Related notes:
Group agreed on 18-08-2010 to require at least one of <category>, <dimension>, <appraisal> and <action-tendency>.
Marc Schröder, 18 Aug 2010, 09:52:16Display change log
