W3C  
XForms Patent Statements

The following statements are the patent disclosures and license commitments associated with the W3C XForms 1.0 Working Draft 18 January 2002 and provided by members of the XForms WG as required by W3C procedure. These statements may be subject to modification based on discussions during the W3C Advisory Council review period.
W3C does not take a position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property right or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology, nor the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available. Copyright of the XForms specification document and other WG deliverables is vested in the W3C.

Summary of patent statements for XForms 1.0

This table summarizes patent statements for XForms 1.0 from XForms WG members who are in good standing and those in not in good standing. Either these members have provided patent disclosures and license commitments statements or have stated that they do not have intellectual property rights relating to the XForms WG. The 'license summary' column is a W3C Team characterization of the Member's statement into one of three general types of licenses: 1) Royalty-free, 2) Reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (RAND), or 3) no license offer because the Member claims it has no relevant patents. This summary is not offered to suggest the exact licensing terms. The precise terms of any licence, however, are governed entirely by the Member's statement. Names in the 'Member name' column mentionned with an * are invited experts.

Member name Patent declaration

License statement

standing
Adobe No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JulSep/0024.html

Good

Cardiff Software, Inc. No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0061.html

Good

Computer Associates. No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002AprJun/0088.html

EDF R&D No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0086.html

Ericsson/Sony Not yet provided

Good

Helsinki University Of Technology No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0050.html

Good

IBM No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002AprJun/0087.html

Good

SAP/Mozquito Technologies Not yet provided

Good

Netscape/AOL

Novell Not yet provided

Good

NTT DoCoMo, Inc. No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0098.html

Good

Openwave Not yet provided

Good

Oracle No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0072.html

Good

PureEdge No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002AprJun/0089.html

Good

Xerox No relevant patents http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002AprJun/0086.html

Good

1- Provided patent statements from W3C Members not part of XForms WG

Shana:

Shana had a press release that claimed they had a patent that "impacts" XForms. The release used to be at http://www.shana.com/press/releases/48.asp but was removed.
The relevant quote from the release is at
http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1035 and also some bits at http://www.entrust.com/news/files/01_22_01_656.htm

XForms WG:

Digital signature: XForms 1.0 does not address signatures of digest authentication, but technically it should be possible in a future version. However, the XForms WG is aware of a patent (note: we believe the scope of the patent is outside the scope of XForms 1.0). cf. current W3C Team knowledge on the Shana Patent: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-forms/2001JanMar/0105.html

Note that the disclosure at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2001JanMar/0025.html
does not mention XForms at all.


2- Provided patent statements from XForms WG Members for XForms1.0

Cardiff Software, Inc.:

Intellectual Property Rights (please choose one)
[ X ] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal
[ ] We do have patent claims that we believe will be essential for the implementation of the proposed W3C Specification and have chosen to make them available to all on (check one)
[ ] royalty-free, with other reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (or)
[ ] reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, with the potential for charging fees
Please list details of the associated patents or patent applications as appropriate.

--
Available at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0061.html


Computer Associates:

Intellectual Property Rights (please choose one)

[X] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal

[no] We do have patent claims that we believe will be essential for the implementation of the proposed W3C Specification and have chosen to make them available to all on (check one)

[no] royalty-free, with other reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (or) [no] reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, with the potential for charging fees Please list details of the associated patents or patent applications as appropriate.

--
Available at:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002AprJun/0088.html


EDF R&D:

Hi, here is the patent form.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intellectual Property Rights (please choose one)

[ X ] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal
[ ] We do have patent claims that we believe will be essential for the implementation of the proposed W3C Specification and have chosen to make them available to all on (check one)
[ ] royalty-free, with other reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (or)
[ ] reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, with the potential for charging fees
Please list details of the associated patents or patent applications as appropriate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regards, Vincent Godefroy

--
Available at:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0086.html


Helsinki University Of Technology:

Intellectual Property Rights (please choose one)
[X] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal
[ ] We do have patent claims that we believe will be essential for the implementation of the proposed W3C Specification and have chosen to make them available to all on (check one) [ ] royalty-free, with other reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (or)
[ ] reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, with the potential for charging fees
Please list details of the associated patents or patent applications as appropriate.

Regards, Mikko Honkala Invited Expert Helsinki University Of Technology

--
Available at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0050.html


IBM:

Intellectual Property Rights (please choose one)

[X] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this Working Group

NOTE: In the event we find any patents with essential patent claims we will disclose such claims to the Working Group with the terms under which they will be available for licensing

--
Available at:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002AprJun/0087.html


NTT DoCoMo:

Here is the patent statement of XForms from NTT DoCoMo.
------------------------------------------
Intellectual Property Rights (please choose one)

[X] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal
[ ] We do have patent claims that we believe will be essential for the implementation of the proposed W3C Specification and have chosen to make them available to all on (check one)
[ ] royalty-free, with other reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (or)
[ ] reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, with the potential for charging fees
Please list details of the associated patents or patent applications as appropriate.

Best Regards, Kaori Nakai

--
Available at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0098.html


ORACLE:

Intellectual Property Rights (please choose one)

[X] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal

--
Available at:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002JanMar/0072.html


PureEdge:

Intellectual Property Rights (please choose one)

[ X ] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal

[ ] We do have patent claims that we believe will be essential for the implementation of the proposed W3C Specification and have chosen to make them available to all on (check one)

[ ] royalty-free, with other reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (or)

[ ] reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, with the potential for charging fees Please list details of the associated patents or patent applications as appropriate.

--
Available at:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002AprJun/0089.html


XEROX:

Intellectual Property Rights statement:

[X] Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal.

--
Available at:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/patent-issues/2002AprJun/0086.html


Thierry Michel tmichel@w3.org