ACTION-180

Write to EXI WG wrt EXI Best Practices of 2007-12-19 saying that, presuming the draft still reflects their intent, the TAG is happy, but would like a more explicit statement of the 'fudge' involved in treating EXI as a Content Encoding

State:

closed

Person:

Henry S. Thompson

Due on:

2008-10-02

Created on:

2008-09-25

Associated Issue:

binaryXML-30

Related emails:

1. RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-11-10)
2. RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-11-01)
3. RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (from sklein@cpcug.org on 2009-04-22)
4. RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-04-21)
5. RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-09)
6. RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-02-28)
7. RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-17)
8. RE: [Fwd: RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices] (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-02-06)
9. Re: [Fwd: RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices] (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-06)
10. Re: [Fwd: RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices] (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-05)
11. [Fwd: RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices] (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2009-02-05)
12. Agenda Question Re: 'Schedule more discussion of exi architecture charset/encoding etc.' (from skw@hp.com on 2008-10-01)

Related notes:

Display change log.