ISSUE-50: Validation criteria for mapping graphs
validation
Validation criteria for mapping graphs
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- R2RML
- Raised by:
- Richard Cyganiak
- Opened on:
- 2011-07-08
- Description:
- The spec contains some language here about what kind of extra triples, beyond those that make up the mapping, are allowed in a mapping graph:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#vocabulary
For example, it says that mapping graphs SHOULD NOT contain terms in the rr: namespace that are not defined in the document, and it says that mapping graphs MAY contain additional properties such as rdfs:label, rdfs:comment etc even though the spec doesn't explicitly talk about them.
This section needs more critical thought. Issues include:
- How do we help catching authoring errors?
- How do we keep the spec extensible in the future? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Closing a few more issues (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-07-20)
- Closing a few more issues (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-07-20)
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC (from juanfederico@gmail.com on 2011-07-19)
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC (from seema.sundara@oracle.com on 2011-07-19)
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC (from marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com on 2011-07-19)
- RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-07-19)
- ISSUE-50 (validation): Validation criteria for mapping graphs [R2RML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-07-08)
Related notes:
This doesn't raise any concerns about R2RML, but is just a call for review. It shouldn't have been an issue in the first place. I'm closing it again.
Richard Cyganiak, 19 Jul 2011, 18:25:28Display change log
