RDF Test Cases feedback
Fixed - reply needed
N-triple unicode escape: upper case?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0050.html
- done in 2002-11-12 Test Cases draft
- N-Triples
[[working on the Ntriples code to output characters.
In http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#ntrip_strings,
it is not explicitly said that hex digits are upper case.
but all examples are upper case.
I suggest to clarify this in the text.
]]
- TODO: Reply to Martin/Jeremy that this is fixed
N-Triples literals
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002AprJun/0074.html
- Typo (fixed) and other comments, Karsten-A. Otto, 2002-05-07
- TODO: Reply that this is fixed
Comments on the new RDF Test Cases draft
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002AprJun/0080.html
- thread on graph isomorphism (Massimo Marchiori), 2002-05-07
- TODO Reply that this is defined in 2002-11-08 rdf-concepts now.
Checking
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0220.html
-- (Jos De Roo) reports failure of following in jena 1.3.0, 2002-03-15
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlbase/test014.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlbase/test014.nt RDF/XML N-TRIPLE
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlbase/test014.rdf[26:48]:
{W105} Redefinition of ID: frag
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlbase/test014.rdf[25:46]:
{W105} Previous definition of 'frag'.
and later:
oops...
jena.rdfcopy seems to be too happy with error001 as well
Test cases now have N-Triples: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure Jan Grant
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0033.html
-- check approved 2002-05-08
ACTION 2002-05-03#10 (jang) rdfms-duplicate-member-props
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0032.html
-- check approved 2002-05-08
Re: test cases needing review
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0144.html
-- approves many tests, reports things (Graham Klyne), 2002-05-30
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0156.html
-- more comments (Jos De Roo), 2002-05-31
rdf:Description & test cases
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jun/0022.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jun/0035.html
-- test case faults (Jeremy Carroll), 2002-06-07
Comments on RDF/XML Test Cases
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0016.html
- test case bugs (Daniel Krech) also at
http://rdflib.net/2002/08/09/rdfxml.html (updated 2002-11-12), 2002-07-07
Re: More tests
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0157.html
-- Jeremy adds some tests, modifies others 2002-07-26
New tests
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0187.html
-- Jeremy adds some test for rdfms-rdf-id, 2002-07-30
XML Base - should be used
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0016.html
-- Jeremy suggest "any test cases with relative URIs should use
XML Base", 2002-09-02
My changes at 2002-09-02 [[
Summary:
rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004
- answer changed now rdf:ID always reifies
- example changed to use legal URIs
rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/test2.nt
- Escape characters in URIs using \u form in N-Triples
xmlbase/test014.nt
- Result subject URI-ref was just wrong for second triple
I think the other pending updates are as follows:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jun/0022.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0016.html
(has #1 above)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0147.html
(has #2 above)
Some of these were approved at the meeting minutes are IRC logs at:
[[action: jang / update test cases in light of bugs]]
-- http://www.w3.org/2002/07/19-rdfcore-irc
]]
All the rdfms-rdf-names-use tests are changed since I updated when we
added rdf:nodeID, rdf:first etc.
Re: WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-05-31
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0162.html
-- jeremy writes tests cases for rdfms-seq-representation, 2002-09-17
Error in RDF parser test cases?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0189.html
- test case bugs (Arjohn Kampman), 2002-09-18
Re: Error in RDF parser test cases?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0202.html
- test cases bugs (Arjohn Kampman), 2002-09-23
feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0032.html
- changes for about/rdf:about on issue
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion
(Dan Brickley) 2002-10-22
Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for rev
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0060.html
- changes to rdfms-rdf-names-use (Daniel Krech), 2002-10-28
Private email.
-- These may not be errors:
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0001
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0002
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0003
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0004
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0005
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0006
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0007
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0008
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/error0009
2002-11-01
[These obsoleted]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0104.html
- test case comments, bugs (Daniel Krech) in attachment at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Nov/att-0031/01-rdfxml.html__charset_UTF-8
also recorded at http://rdflib.net/2002/11/12/rdfxml.html
An update of the older http://rdflib.net/2002/08/09/rdfxml.html
and comment of 2002-07-07. 2002-11-12
[of these:
rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004 was in error, fixed some time ago
xmlbase/test014 was typoed on creation, fixed a while ago.
xmlbase/test015 Think this is ok according to RFC; mailto + frag corner case.
rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test008 Fixed.
rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007 OBSOLETE (rdf:aboutEach)
]
I also noticed:
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/test2.rdf
-- since it does %-escaping of rdf:ID content in making URIs. Is
this right?
Remove all xml"foo" N-Triples.
Replace all "foo"-en with "foo"@en N-Triples.
Dave Beckett