- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:22:15 +0000
- To: <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, <sdwwg@lists.opengeospatial.org>
Agree. Replace with a note: "A model and ontology for temporal reference system definitions is required." Not sure we can say much more in a recommendation document? -----Original Message----- From: Little, Chris [mailto:chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk] Sent: Saturday, 17 December, 2016 02:46 To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>; sdwwg@lists.opengeospatial.org Subject: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 9 Dear All, Here is an issue in the latest draft of the Time Ontology http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ for discussion and resolution. I argue that this is future work, and to put anything into the Ontology now is slightly premature, bearing in mind that there is an active Standards WG on OGC trying to find ways to annotate WKT and ISO8606 syntax to represent unambiguously non-Gregorian calendars and time. I suggest that this work and the related Time Zone specification is tackled together, elsewhere. Chris ---------------- 5.6 Class: TRS [Temporal Reference System] Issue 9 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/66 Should we define a vocabulary for the definition of the other temporal reference system types? (Calendar+clock, temporal coordinate reference system). Perhaps as an additional annex to this document, alongside the Time Zone resource? ---------------- Chris Little Co-Chair, OGC Meteorology & Oceanography Domain Working Group IT Fellow - Operational Infrastructures Met Office FitzRoy Road Exeter Devon EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: +44(0)1392 886278 Fax: +44(0)1392 885681 Mobile: +44(0)7753 880514 E-mail: chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk I am normally at work Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday each week
Received on Sunday, 18 December 2016 12:23:23 UTC