- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > Deferring tree mutations would become slightly simpler if > foster-parented stuff was simply dropped when the table parent is gone. I haven't made this change. It would make other implementation strategies more complex, so there doesn't seem to be an overall clear indication of what would be best. Even in the deferred mutation case, it seems like you could just use a "foster insert" action instead, which the main thread would handle accordingly. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 25 December 2008 11:04:50 UTC