Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007)

On Apr 22, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:28:30 +0200, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com 
> > wrote:
>> Out of curiousity, why does this draft refer to the SQL API but not  
>> the storage interface?  Is storage not also a solution to local  
>> data storage?
>
> It is. I think it was because these features (SQL and offline) were  
> specifically introduced for offline Web applications.
>
> I suppose we could add another section covering that. What do people  
> think?

If I recall correctly, the original motivation for this document was  
to enable wider review of the SQL and offline app features. I think  
covering other related features (storage, navigator.onLine, online/ 
offline events) would make it more useful to a wider audience, so it  
seems like a helpful thing to do.

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 23:26:18 UTC