Re: UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry?

2015-10-26 12:08 GMT+01:00 <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>:

> Minor quibble: should it be the other way round? – i.e. there should be a
> way of linking a vector geometry to the CRS used for positions in the
> geometry.
>
> (There will be a lot more geometries than CRSs).
>

Thanks. I had not thought about the direction of the link, and I had not
realised the wording implies a direction.
Sure, we could write "There should be a recommended way of linking vector
geometry/geometries to a Coordinate Reference System".

Regards,
Frans



>
> *From:* Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
> *Sent:* Monday, 26 October 2015 9:19 PM
> *To:* SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> When I went through the unresolved UCR issues I noticed that ISSUE-29
> <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/29> did not have its
> dedicated e-mail thread yet. With this message that situation has changed!
> So let's discuss...
>
>
>
> The initial proposal was to add a new requirement for the BP
> deliverable: "There should be a recommended way of linking a CRS to a
> vector geometry".
>
>
>
> Does the proposal make sense? Is it clear enough? Please share your
> thoughts and we should be able to make a decision soon.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>