- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:36:06 +0100
- To: Chris Harrelson <chrishtr@chromium.org>
- Cc: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>, Ben Maurer <ben.maurer@gmail.com>, Philip Walton <philipwalton@google.com>, Royi Hagigi <royi@fb.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Chris Harrelson <chrishtr@chromium.org> wrote: > Why not? If the DOM is modified, it should apply its updates on the next > frame, no? Making the load event synchronous just if the style sheet happens to be in a cache seems like a bad API. You effectively change the API contract of <link> based on an externality. Furthermore, it would introduce all the problems we're trying to get rid of by removing synchronous mutation events (at least all of the problems related to synchronous insertion mutation events). -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 10:36:33 UTC