Re: [css-round-display] comments on CSS round from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2015-06-04 (www-style@w3.org from June 2015)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 12:01:00 -0700
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: Hyojin Song <hyojin22.song@lge.com>, Jonathan Kingston <jonathan@jooped.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCih+J=6b-mAuVzx0UHb3r9Ucqwf5RRhuF9b5zh-vrx=A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
> The convention in math is as you say, but other uses of <angle> in css
> have positive values go clockwise, and with 0 at the top. There aren't
> that many uses yet, but I think it would be good to be consistent.

I'll make a stronger statement - we MUST be consistent, and the
pattern that CSS and SVG have already established is bearing angles
(0deg = up, positive angles = clockwise).

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 19:01:48 UTC