- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:39:02 -0500
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
- Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
> CSS 2.2 > ------- > > - Bert reminded the group that tests still need to be written for > some errata changes coming out of 2.1 before 2.2 can be > published. > CSS 2.2 > ------- > > bert: Some time ago we discussed publishing an update for CSS 2.2 > and we discovered we need new tests due to changes from > errata. > <plinss> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.2 > bert: This is a request for people to again look at the wiki page. Bert, Have you examined this section: http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1#css-21-errata I ask because I submitted many new tests (sometimes, 24 months ago) which were created in order to take into account, to take into consideration changes or correction in the CSS2.1 spec. [Rebecca, I think the column "Existing Tests" in http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1#css-21-errata should have been named "Modified tests or new tests".] ------------ Section 6.1.1 http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html#s.6.1.1 have these [new and waiting for review] tests: test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/name/inherit-static-offset ------------ Section 15.3a Test that covers "inherit" as font family name: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/font-family-rule-004a.htm ---------- Section 17.5 http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html#s.17.5 [css21] Section 17.5.2.1 should be clarified http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0743.html Following up on that thread, I submitted 52 tests on 'table-layout: fixed' http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/testcase/spec/css21/author/gtalbot/name/fixed-table-layout-003/ and these need to be reviewed. There are at least 3 tests (among those 52) which represent an unexpected issue with the current spec: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-003e08.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-003e10.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-003e12.htm More info: [CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0093.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0189.html Added to these 52 are http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-025.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-026.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-027.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-028.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-029.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-030.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-031.htm which present also that same unexpected issue for the current CSS2.1 spec. ------------- Again in section 17.4 and/or 17.5.2: http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/anonymous-table-box-width-001/ http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/anonymous-table-box-width-001.htm (waiting for review) Right now, there are 1 bug report on this at Microsoft IE Feedback and 2 bug reports at bugzilla.mozilla.org. etc.. Gérard ... who must run right now..
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 09:39:40 UTC