- From: Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:23:04 +0100
- To: public-dpvcg@w3.org
Dear All, A preliminary version of rdf files is now available on the Github repo [1] I propose the following, welcoming comments/alternatives: 1. Have 'modular' files for each sub-vocabulary (base, purpose, etc.) + one combined file 2. dpv-gdpr and dpv-nace have their own files and documentation (Agreed on 19-06-04 call) 3. Add metadata to file using "owl:Ontology" e.g. abstract, date (this means we would be defining these as OWL2 ontologies - any objections? We already have OWL2 semantics when we use union in property range) - this is also considered as general good practice [1] https://github.com/dpvcg/extract-sheets/tree/rdf/docs/rdf - Harsh On 04/06/2019 15:15, Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group Issue Tracker wrote: > dpvcg-ACTION-111: Generate the separate rdf files per namespace. > > https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/track/actions/111 > > Assigned to: Harshvardhan Pandit > > > > > > > > -- --- Harshvardhan Pandit PhD Researcher ADAPT Centre Trinity College Dublin
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2019 15:23:32 UTC