- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:24:27 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 25/03/15 02:11, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Yup, that's it. The change isn't intentional, it just falls out of the > the easiest way to define it in each of the two grammar forms. > > I could rename <any-value> to <property-value> and make a new > <any-value> that is less restrictive, if you think it's valuable. That sounds like as good a way to do it as any, but I do think we should fix unintentional arbitrary syntax restrictions. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 01:25:00 UTC