- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:17:07 +1000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Markus Bruch <macinfo@arcor.de>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/08/2011 9:51 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Alan Gresley<alan@css-class.com> wrote: >> I totally agree with Tab here regarding a 2-hexadigit variant. The expansion >> rule is different and could be confusing to authors if any method was >> spec'd. I'm also against having a 4-hexadigit as a shortcut for 8-hexadigit >> (last two digits for alpha). > > Bwuh? Are you against an 8-digit hex variant as well, or just against > the 4-digit variant specifically? If the latter, why? 4-digit hex is > expanded to 8-digit hex in exactly the same way that 3-digit expands > to 6-digit. > > ~TJ I support an 8-digit hex with an extra two hex places for alpha (#RRGGBBAA). I believe having a shortcut for this is extra confusing an unnecessary. -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 02:17:34 UTC