- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:58:29 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 27.02.2011 17:17, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 02/26/2011 02:08 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> >>> If ISSUE-125 depends on the outcome of ISSUE-126 then they should have >>> been considered together, but that's up to you and the chairs. As things >>> stand, if just your CP for ISSUE-125 is accepted then the resulting >>> algorithm will not 'parse quotes in Content-Type headers in "meta" >>> elements in a HTTP compliant manner', and so the willful violation >>> cannot be removed. >> >> Well, they have been raised together. The timing of the polls is >> something outside my control. > > We previously had been evaluating your request to park issue 126 until > issue 125 has been resolved[1]. As this no longer appears to be your > wishes, I will see to it that a poll for issue 126 is issued early this > week. For simplicity, can we wait until the change for 126 is in, and then maybe run 126 and 148 in parallel? Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 07:59:16 UTC