canvas 2d context
Encrypted Media Extensions
HTML 5 spec
HTML 5: The Markup Language
HTML WG website
HTML5 differences from HTML4
HTML5 Spec - PR Blockers
Media Source Extensions
pre-LC1 alt techniques
pre-LC1 authoring guide
pre-LC1 HTML 5 spec
Erika Doyle Navara
Philippe Le Hégaret
Joshue O Connor
This issue was raised on behalf of Julian Reschke. See the associated bug for details:
Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):
The actual issue is not whether or not pingback should be valid, but whether it needs to be mentioned in the HTML spec given that it's in the registry.
In http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12224#c5, Ian Hickson writes:
"IMHO, we should to a state where the registry is just used to avoid name clashes in development, and once a feature is proved we should move it to the spec. I haven't set that up yet, but that's where I'm headed."
This implies that the spec will need continuous changes while new relations are defined, which is unlikely what the WG wanted when it decided on a registry mechanism.
[hober]: rel-pingback, Call for Consensus closed Aug 24