BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.5.8//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
LAST-MODIFIED:20230518T212220Z
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-TZID:13
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20221106T090000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20231105T090000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20230312T100000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:cff6ac42-bdc2-4a38-8993-7dd46e507741
DTSTAMP:20230518T212220Z
SUMMARY:Bi-Weekly Meeting of Assistive Technology Automation Subgroup of AR
 IA-AT Community Group
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20230522T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20230522T130000
DESCRIPTION:https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/cff6ac42-bdc2-4a38-8993-7dd4
 6e507741/20230522T120000/\n\nThis group is developing a draft proposal for
  a W3C AT Driver Specification.\n\nGitHub repository: https://github.com/w
 3c/aria-at-automation\n\nAgenda\n\n- [Should one tester be able to assign 
 verdicts to AT responses collected by another?](https://github.com/w3c/ari
 a-at/issues/936)\n- [Should it be possible for multiple testers to assign 
 verdicts to a single set of AT responses?](https://github.com/w3c/aria-at/
 issues/937)\n- [Should verdict assignment depend on response verification?
 ](https://github.com/w3c/aria-at/issues/938)\n- [Rethinking the wording fo
 r assertion verdicts](https://github.com/w3c/aria-at/issues/945)
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CREATED:20230518T212219Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230518T212220Z
SEQUENCE:2
ORGANIZER;CN=W3C Calendar;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=NON-PARTICIPANT:mailto:nor
 eply@w3.org
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=GROUP;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;RSVP=FALSE;CN=ARIA and Assistive
  Technologies Community Group:mailto:public-aria-at@w3.org
RECURRENCE-ID;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20230522T120000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR