ISSUE-26: glossary to be added to the document?

glossary

glossary to be added to the document?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Group Note 1 -- General
Raised by:
José Manuel Alonso
Opened on:
2009-04-23
Description:
Some have suggested this, as an example Anna Zhuang suggested:
"You may consider putting together an achronym list and explain all abbreviations there and even add links to standards or whatever applicable. You can also have a glossary."

Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Re: ISO 639 Cookbook was ... LD? algorithm and questions. (from gannon_dick@yahoo.com on 2012-03-27)
  2. Re: ISO 639 Cookbook was ... LD? algorithm and questions. (from konstant@iit.demokritos.gr on 2012-03-27)
  3. [minutes] eGov IG call, 29 April 2009 (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-29)
  4. Re: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-24)
  5. Re: Multi-Channel Section . Reinforced the re-use of government information (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-23)
  6. ISSUE-26 (glossary): glossary to be added to the document? [Group Note 1 -- General] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-04-23)

Related notes:

[josema]: see ACTION-56

29 Apr 2009, 13:43:25

ACTION-56 opened to develop the glossary as agreed

ISSUE closed

José Manuel Alonso, 29 Apr 2009, 17:04:34

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 26.html,v 1.1 2013-08-20 15:04:16 ted Exp $