Adrian has been working on how octave shifts should be handled in MNX-Common, and has prepared a pull request #158<\/a> to address issue #111<\/a>, which covers both the specification for and examples of the proposed octave-shift<\/strong> element. The co-chairs welcome feedback from the community about this new specification element. You can view the updated MNX-Common by Example file without checking out the branch here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you have any comments about this proposed change, please leave a comment in the pull request.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Adrian plans to continue work on spanning elements since he has now got a good feel of the issues these notations present, which will address issue #114<\/a> among others. He also plans to add a further example for the octave-shift<\/strong> element that applies only to a single voice or sequence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Michael and Daniel did not have any updates on the MusicXML 3.2 or SMuFL 1.4 projects for this meeting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The next co-chair meeting will be on Tuesday 10 September.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" MNX-Common by Example Adrian has been working on how octave shifts should be handled in MNX-Common, and has prepared a pull request #158 to address issue #111, which covers both the specification for and examples of the proposed octave-shift element. … Continue reading MusicXML 3.2 and SMuFL 1.4<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Next meeting<\/h3>\n\n\n\n