Hej all,<\/p>\n
Isn’t anyone more than me concerned about the enormous amount of energy the WEB transforms?<\/p>\n
I feel very frustrated. This post is wild, unpolite and unstructured but I hope someone will pick up the message.<\/p>\n
Outdated HTML ?<\/strong><\/p>\n Even though much effort is spent on virtualization WEB-serves the overall load is depending on the fact that we feed the computers with data using OUTDATED protocols. I mean that the HTML really is mature enough for architectural refactoring.<\/p>\n 90% reloaded<\/strong><\/p>\n Most of you – I think – are often disturbed by long response time but also quite annoyed on uncertain behavior of a WEB interaction. The very point in this observation is that the basic HTML with its PAGE\/BODY metaphor is from old batch -90 IT-system. In a session – constituted by a set of interactions – the whole content on the user screen is (re)produced by the server, transported and rendered. <ReplaceSomething ID=”…><\/strong><\/p>\n But the basic HTML has no tag for <ReplaceSomething ID=”…>.<\/p>\n If such a mechanism – REPLACE – was introduced I think we can reduce the energy utilization by 90% – a magnitude – and also make it much more easier for the Dialog Constructor on the server to really make a radically more understandable interactions and express the in basic HTML perhaps using the MVC Pattern.<\/p>\n Of course there exist solutions today which will work like REPLACE PART. Build a mix of javascript, AJAX and JSON\/HTML. But this should be standard in basic HTML. No javascript for this.<\/p>\n Compatibility<\/strong><\/p>\n The WEB-browser must deal with the <REPLACE> 1. <!doctype as present standard of course …> Focus on goals (Energy Utilization)<\/strong><\/p>\n Forget the obsessed focus on functions and performance! Hurry up before the goverments detects that there are no relationships between W3C and Energy Utilization.<\/p>\n I’m not the guy to run or orchestra a group on ‘WEB Protocols and Energy Utilization’ but I can contribute with experience and idea and reviews.<\/p>\n Cheers!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Hej all, Isn’t anyone more than me concerned about the enormous amount of energy the WEB transforms? I feel very frustrated. This post is wild, unpolite and unstructured but I hope someone will pick up the message. Outdated HTML ? … Continue reading
\nProtocols Like HTML\/CSS\/Javascript\/HTTP\/Cookies etc have become
\na mess of construction like using LEGO, MECCANO and bunch of different glues at the same time<\/p>\n
\nEven though most of the visual screen is he same! My experiences the last years are that 90% of the visual screen is the same between two steps – just 10% is changed.
\nBut HTML is not able – by design – to just send the changes.<\/p>\n
\nIntroduce a <!doctype ResponseCouldBeBodyOrReplace …\/> telling that responses from an HREF et al. request might be one of<\/p>\n
\n2. <!doctype ResponseCouldBeBodyOrReplace …\/>
\n3. <!doctype Replace…\/><REPLACEPARTS>…<\/REPLACEPARTS><\/p>\n
\nForget cache (rethink).
\nRecfactor CSS into layout (positioning) and style (texture) at least.
\nForget javascript, forget crawlers.
\nForget for the present.<\/p>\n