00:28:35 <Norm> Norm has joined #xproc
00:51:34 <zarella> zarella has left #xproc
02:05:08 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, Suite_1235, in XML_PMWG(TPAC)11:30AM
02:05:13 <Zakim> XML_PMWG(TPAC)11:30AM has ended
02:05:14 <Zakim> Attendees were MoZ, Salon_2, Suite_1235
02:15:24 <Zakim> Zakim has left #xproc
16:54:07 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #xproc
16:54:07 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/11/03-xproc-irc
16:54:14 <Norm> Zakim, this will be xproc
16:54:14 <Zakim> ok, Norm; I see XML_PMWG(TPAC)11:30AM scheduled to start 24 minutes ago
16:56:44 <Norm> Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
16:56:44 <Norm> Date: 3 Nov 2009
16:56:44 <Norm> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/11/02-agenda
16:56:44 <Norm> Meeting: 159
16:56:44 <Norm> Chair: Norm
16:56:45 <Norm> Scribe: Norm
16:56:49 <Norm> ScribeNick: Norm
16:56:55 <Norm> Topic: Schema validity tests
16:58:11 <Norm> Norm: I've confirmed that SaxonSA will support setting strict and lax.
16:58:48 <Norm> Norm: Henry, can you write a couple of simple schema tests that will demonstrate use of strict vs. lax?
16:58:50 <Norm> Henry: Yes
17:49:12 <ht> ht has joined #xproc
17:49:37 <Norm> svn co http://svn.xproc.org/tests
18:11:44 <zarella> zarella has joined #xproc
18:21:20 <Norm> Is writing tests interesting?
18:21:36 <Norm> ht, http://www.whygitisbetterthanx.com/
18:29:44 <zarella_> zarella_ has joined #xproc
19:00:38 <Zakim> Zakim has left #xproc
19:43:03 <Norm> Topic: Processing external subsets
19:43:25 <Norm> Some discussion of p:document; the spec currently says "The external subset should not be processed, but some parsers do not provide that option."
19:43:56 <Norm> Is that really what we want? Should we delete that sentence? Should we change that to "should"?
19:51:29 <zarella_> zarella_ has joined #xproc
20:13:43 <Norm> Further discussion reveals that p:document must be wrong in this regard since if you don't expand entities you can't perform XPath on the resulting documents.
22:17:08 <Norm> Norm has joined #xproc