Edit ISSUE-334: Inconsistency between spec and implementation guide





Raised By:


Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

No related emails.

Related notes:

A couple of other notes:

1. There is an implied principled reason (heuristic?) for choosing between label and labelledby. If the text for the label is already present as content in the document, use labelledby. If there is a need to not the text as content, then use label.

2. There is a related issue, 319 [1], about the presence of both aria-label and aria-labelledby.

[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/319
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/2009AprJun/0073.htm

Joseph Scheuhammer, 2 Jul 2009, 14:25:25

When Action 548 and 549 are completed this issue is resolved.

Richard Schwerdtfeger, 30 Nov 2009, 15:57:17

The UAIG has now been rolled back to use the algorithm in the February draft. Some of the original errors have been corrected.

The UAIG now agrees with the spec that aria-label should be given precedence. David is reviewing it to ensure that the algorithm per the spec to ensure that everything else is in agreement.

Andi Snow-Weaver, 2 Dec 2009, 16:55:28

Closed Jan. 4, 2010. December 2009 drafts reflected consistency.

Richard Schwerdtfeger, 4 Jan 2010, 15:39:55

Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, James Nurthen <nurthen@adobe.com>, Chairs, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Ruoxi Ran <ran@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $