Edit ACTION-2146: Review web of things (wot) architecture




Due Date:

(accepts formats such as "2005-05-17", "+1 week", "14 August 2005" and "next Thursday")

Associated Issue:

Or Associated Product:

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. Minutes from 20 September (from janina@rednote.net on 2017-09-20) (from janina@rednote.net on 2017-09-20)
  2. apa-ACTION-2146: Review web of things (wot) architecture (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2017-09-20) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2017-09-20)

Related notes:

[MichaelC]: https://www.w3.org/TR/wot-architecture/

20 Sep 2017, 16:46:39

[MichaelC]: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Web_of_Things_(WoT)_Architecture

20 Sep 2017, 16:46:51

No specific issue with the architecture proposed except that some sections could be more clearly delineated. Also, do we need diagram descriptions? I think not, but we need the WG's opinion.
However, the security section of this spec bolsters our case for a11y sections in spec reviews, because we would have similar concerns to convey. We should create a tracker issue for exemplary security or privacy spec sections and associate this spec action with that issue.

Janina Sajka, 9 Dec 2017, 23:40:08

Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com>, Chairs, Ruoxi Ran <ran@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $