W3C
Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core
W3C Working Draft 15 February 2005
This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050215
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core
Previous versions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ws-addr-core-20041208
Editors:
Martin Gudgin, Microsoft Corp
Marc Hadley, Sun Microsystems, Inc
This document is also available in these non-normative formats: postscript, PDF
, XML, and plain text.
Copyright © 2005 W3C^® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability,
trademark and document use rules apply.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Abstract
Web Services Addressing provides transport-neutral mechanisms to address Web
services and messages. Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core (this document)
defines a set of abstract properties and an XML Infoset [XML Information Set]
representation thereof to reference Web services and to facilitate end-to-end
addressing of endpoints in messages. This specification enables messaging
systems to support message transmission through networks that include
processing nodes such as endpoint managers, firewalls, and gateways in a
transport-neutral manner.
Status of this Document
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its
publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C
publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in
the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
This is the second Public Working Draft of the Web Services Addressing 1.0 -
Core specification for review by W3C members and other interested parties. It
has been produced by the Web Services Addressing Working Group (WG), which is
part of the W3C Web Services Activity.
This Working Draft reflects the current position of the Working Group. A
diff-marked version against the previous version of this document is available.
For a detailed list of changes since the last publication of this document,
please refer to appendix B. Change Log. A list of remaining issues is also
available.
Discussion of this document takes place on the public-ws-addressing@w3.org
mailing list (public archive). Comments on this specification should be sent to
this mailing list.
This document was produced under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. The
Working Group maintains a public list of patent disclosures relevant to this
document; that page also includes instructions for disclosing [and excluding] a
patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual
believes contains Essential Claim(s) with respect to this specification should
disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
Per section 4 of the W3C Patent Policy, Working Group participants have 150
days from the title page date of this document to exclude essential claims from
the W3C RF licensing requirements with respect to this document series.
Exclusions are with respect to the exclusion reference document, defined by the
W3C Patent Policy to be the latest version of a document in this series that is
published no later than 90 days after the title page date of this document.
Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C
Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted
by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as
other than work in progress.
┌──────────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┐
│Editorial note │ │
├──────────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────┤
│The Web Services Addressing Working Group has decided to use XML Schema, │
│where appropriate, to describe constructs defined in this specification. Note│
│that this restricts use of Web Services Addressing to XML 1.0. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Short Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Endpoint References
3. Message Addressing Properties
4. References
A. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
B. Change Log (Non-Normative)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1 Notational Conventions
1.2 Namespaces
2. Endpoint References
2.1 Information Model for Endpoint References
2.2 Endpoint Reference XML Infoset Representation
2.3 Endpoint Reference Comparison
2.4 Endpoint Reference Lifecycle
3. Message Addressing Properties
3.1 XML Infoset Representation of Message Addressing Properties
3.2 Formulating a Reply Message
4. References
Appendices
A. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
B. Change Log (Non-Normative)
B.1 Changes Since First Working Draft
B.2 Changes Since Submission
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Introduction
Web Services Addressing (WS-Addressing) defines two constructs, message
addressing properties and endpoint references, that normalize the information
typically provided by transport protocols and messaging systems in a way that
is independent of any particular transport or messaging system.
A Web service endpoint is a (referenceable) entity, processor, or resource to
which Web service messages can be addressed. Endpoint references convey the
information needed to address a Web service endpoint.
This specification defines a family of message addressing properties that
convey end-to-end message characteristics including references for source and
destination endpoints and message identity that allows uniform addressing of
messages independent of the underlying transport.
Both of these constructs are designed to be extensible and re-usable so that
other specifications can build on and leverage endpoint references and message
information headers.
The following example illustrates the use of these mechanisms in a SOAP 1.2
message being sent from http://example.com/business/client1 to http://
example.com/fabrikam/Purchasing:
Example 1-1. Use of message addressing properties in a SOAP 1.2 message.
(001)
(002)
(003)
(004) http://example.com/6B29FC40-CA47-1067-B31D-00DD010662DA
(005)
(006)
(007) http://example.com/business/client1
(008)
(009) http://example.com/fabrikam/Purchasing
(010) http://example.com/fabrikam/SubmitPO
(011)
(012)
(013) ...
(014)
(015)
Lines (002) to (011) represent the header of the SOAP message where the
mechanisms defined in the specification are used. The body is represented by
lines (012) to (014).
Lines (003) to (010) contain the message information header blocks.
Specifically, lines (003) to (005) specify the identifier for this message and
lines (006) to (008) specify the endpoint to which replies to this message
should be sent as an Endpoint Reference. Line (009) specifies the address URI
of the ultimate receiver of this message. Line (010) specifies an Action URI
identifying expected semantics.
1.1 Notational Conventions
The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",
"SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be
interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [IETF RFC 2119].
When describing abstract data models, this specification uses the notational
convention used by the XML Infoset [XML Information Set]. Specifically,
abstract property names always appear in square brackets (e.g., [some
property]).
When describing concrete XML schemas [XML Schema Structures, XML Schema
Datatypes], this specification uses the notational convention of WS-Security [
WS-Security]. Specifically, each member of an element's [children] or
[attributes] property is described using an XPath-like notation (e.g., /
x:MyHeader/x:SomeProperty/@value1). The use of {any} indicates the presence of
an element wildcard (). The use of @{any} indicates the presence of an
attribute wildcard ().
1.2 Namespaces
This specification uses a number of namespace prefixes throughout; they are
listed in Table 1-1. Note that the choice of any namespace prefix is arbitrary
and not semantically significant (see [XML Namespaces ]).
Table 1-1. Prefixes and Namespaces used in this
specification
┌──────┬────────────────────────────────────────┐
│Prefix│Namespace │
├──────┼────────────────────────────────────────┤
│S │http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope │
├──────┼────────────────────────────────────────┤
│S11 │http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope│
├──────┼────────────────────────────────────────┤
│wsa │http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing │
├──────┼────────────────────────────────────────┤
│xs │http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema │
└──────┴────────────────────────────────────────┘
WS-Addressing may be used with SOAP [SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework] as
described in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - SOAP Binding[WS-Addressing-SOAP].
WS-Addressing may be used with WSDL [WSDL 2.0] described services as described
in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - WSDL Binding[WS-Addressing-WSDL]. Examples in
this specification use an XML 1.0 [XML 1.0] representation but this is not a
requirement.
All information items defined by WS-Addressing are identified by the XML
namespace URI [XML Namespaces] "http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing". A
normative XML Schema [XML Schema Structures, XML Schema Datatypes] document can
be obtained by dereferencing the XML namespace URI.
2. Endpoint References
This section defines the information model and syntax of an endpoint reference.
This specification introduces the endpoint reference, a construct designed to
support the following usage scenarios:
• Dynamic generation and customization of service endpoint descriptions.
• Referencing and description of specific service instances that are created
as the result of stateful interactions.
• Flexible and dynamic exchange of endpoint information in tightly coupled
environments where communicating parties share a set of common assumptions
about specific policies or protocols that are used during the interaction.
2.1 Information Model for Endpoint References
An endpoint reference consists of the following abstract properties:
[address] : URI (mandatory)
An address URI for the endpoint. This may be a network address or a logical
address.
[reference parameters] : xs:any (0..unbounded).
A reference may contain a number of individual parameters which are
associated with the endpoint to facilitate a particular interaction.
Reference parameters are element information items that are named by QName
and are required to properly interact with the endpoint. Reference
parameters are also provided by the issuer of the endpoint reference and
are otherwise assumed to be opaque to consuming applications. The use of
reference parameters is dependent upon the protocol binding and data
encoding used to interact with the endpoint. Web Services Addressing 1.0 -
SOAP Binding[WS-Addressing-SOAP] describes the default binding for the SOAP
protocol.
[selected interface] : QName (0..1)
A QName identifying a description of the sequences of messages that a
service sends and/or receives, see Web Services Addressing 1.0 - WSDL
Binding[WS-Addressing-WSDL] for more details.
[service endpoint] : (QName, NCName (0..1)) (0..1)
A QName, NCName pair: the QName identifies a description of a set of
endpoints at which a particular Web service is deployed; the NCName
identifies one endpoint in particular. See Web Services Addressing 1.0 -
WSDL Binding[WS-Addressing-WSDL] for more details.
[policies] : xsd:any (0..unbounded)
A reference may contain a number of policies that describe the behavior,
requirements and capabilities of the endpoint. Policies may be included in
an endpoint to facilitate easier processing by the consuming application,
or because the policy was dynamically generated. However, embedded policies
are not authoritative and may be stale or incoherent with the policies
associated with the endpoint at the time when the interaction occurs.
2.2 Endpoint Reference XML Infoset Representation
This section defines an XML Infoset-based representation for an endpoint
reference as both an XML type (wsa:EndpointReferenceType) and as an XML element
().
The wsa:EndpointReferenceType type is used wherever a Web service endpoint is
referenced. The following describes the contents of this type:
Example 2-1. Structure of the wsa:EndpointReference element.
xs:anyURI
... ?
xs:QName ?
xs:QName ?
... ?
*
The following describes the attributes and elements listed in the schema
overview above:
/wsa:EndpointReference
This represents some element of type wsa:EndpointReferenceType. This
example uses the predefined element, but any
element of type wsa:EndpointReferenceType may be used.
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:Address
This REQUIRED element (of type xs:anyURI) specifies the [address] property
of the endpoint reference. This address may be a logical address for the
service endpoint.
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:ReferenceParameters/
This OPTIONAL element contains the elements that convey the [reference
parameters] of the reference.
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:ReferenceParameters/{any}
Each child element of ReferenceParameters represents an individual
[reference parameter].
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:InterfaceName
This OPTIONAL element (of type xs:Qname) specifies the value of the
[selected interface] property of the endpoint reference, see Web Services
Addressing 1.0 - WSDL Binding[WS-Addressing-WSDL] for more details..
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:ServiceName
This OPTIONAL element (of type xs:QName) specifies the value of the
[service endpoint] property, see Web Services Addressing 1.0 - WSDL Binding
[WS-Addressing-WSDL] for more details..
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:ServiceName/@EndpointName
This OPTIONAL attribute (of type xs:NCName) specifies the name of a
particular endpoint, see Web Services Addressing 1.0 - WSDL Binding[
WS-Addressing-WSDL] for more details.
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:Policies
This OPTIONAL element contains policies that are relevant to the
interaction with the endpoint.
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:Policies/{any}
Each child element of Policies represents an individual [policy].
/wsa:EndpointReference/{any}
This is an extensibility mechanism to allow additional elements to be
specified.
/wsa:EndpointReference/@{any}
This is an extensibility mechanism to allow additional attributes to be
specified. Some examples in this specification show use of this
extensibility point to include a wsdlLocation[WSDL 2.0] attribute to
provide a hint for the location of a WSDL description of the [selected
interface] and [service endpoint] properties.
The following shows an example endpoint reference. This element references the
[selected interface] "fabrikam:Inventory" at the endpoint URI "http://
example.com/www.fabrikam/acct". Note the use of the WSDL[WSDL 2.0] wsdlLocation
attribute.
Example 2-2. Example endpoint reference.
http://example.com/fabrikam/acct
fabrikam:Inventory
2.3 Endpoint Reference Comparison
During the course of Web services interactions applications may receive
multiple endpoint references describing the endpoints it needs to interact
with. Different copies of an endpoint reference may also be received over time.
The following rule clarifies the relation between the behaviors of the
endpoints represented by two endpoint references with the same [address];
• The two endpoints accept the same sets of messages, and follow and require
the same set of policies. That is, the XML Schema, WSDL, and policy and
other metadata applicable to the two references are the same.
However, the metadata embedded in each of the EPRs MAY differ, as the metadata
carried by an EPR is not necessarily a complete statement of the metadata
pertaining to the endpoint. Moreover, while embedded metadata is necessarily
valid at the time the EPR is initially created it may become stale at a later
point in time.
To deal with conflicts between the embedded metadata of two EPRs, or between
embedded metadata and metadata obtained from a different source, or to
ascertain the current validity of embedded metadata, mechanisms that are
outside of the scope of this specification, such as EPR life cycle information
[see 2.4 Endpoint Reference Lifecycle] or retrieval of metadata from an
authoritative source, SHOULD be used.
The [address] properties of two endpoint references are compared according to
Section 6 of [RFC 3986].
Therefore, a consuming application should assume that different XML Schemas,
WSDL definitions and policies apply to endpoint references whose addresses
differ.
2.4 Endpoint Reference Lifecycle
This specification does not define a lifecycle model for endpoint references
and does not address the question of time-to-live for endpoint references.
Other specifications that build on or use WS-Addressing may define a lifecycle
model for endpoint references created according to that specification.
3. Message Addressing Properties
This section defines the information model and syntax of message addressing
properties.
Message addressing properties provide references for the endpoints involved in
an interaction. The use of these properties to support specific interaction is
in general defined by both the semantics of the properties themselves and the
implicit or explicit contract that governs the message exchange. If explicitly
available, this contract can take different forms including but not being
limited to WSDL MEPs and interfaces; business processes and e-commerce
specifications, among others, can also be used to define explicit contracts
between the parties. The basic interaction pattern from which all others are
composed is "one way". In this pattern a source sends a message to a
destination without any further definition of the interaction. "Request Reply"
is a common interaction pattern that consists of an initial message sent by a
source endpoint (the request) and a subsequent message sent from the
destination of the request back to the source (the reply). A reply in this case
can be either an application message, a fault, or any other message. Note,
however, that reply messages may be sent as part of other message exchanges as
well, and are not restricted to the usual single Request, single Reply pattern,
or to a particular WSDL MEP. The contract between the interacting parties may
specify that multiple or even a variable number or replies be delivered.
Message addressing properties collectively augment a message with the following
abstract properties to support one way, request reply, and any other
interaction pattern:
[destination] : URI (mandatory)
The address of the intended receiver of this message.
[source endpoint] : endpoint reference (0..1)
Reference of the endpoint where the message originated from.
[reply endpoint] : endpoint reference (0..1)
An endpoint reference for the intended receiver for replies to this
message. If a reply is expected, a message MUST contain a [reply endpoint].
The sender MUST use the contents of the [reply endpoint] to formulate the
reply message as defined in 3.2 Formulating a Reply Message. If this
property is present, the [message id] property is REQUIRED.
[fault endpoint] : endpoint reference (0..1)
An endpoint reference for the intended receiver for faults related to this
message. When formulating a fault message as defined in 3.2 Formulating a
Reply Message, the sender MUST use the contents of the [fault endpoint],
when present, of the message being replied to to formulate the fault
message. If this property is present, the [message id] property is
REQUIRED.
[action] : URI (mandatory)
An identifier that uniquely (and opaquely) identifies the semantics implied
by this message.
It is RECOMMENDED that value of the [action] property is a URI identifying
an input, output, or fault message within a WSDL port type. An action may
be explicitly or implicitly associated with the corresponding WSDL
definition. Web Services Addressing 1.0 - WSDL Binding[WS-Addressing-WSDL]
describes the mechanisms of association. Finally, if in addition to the
[action] property, a SOAP Action URI is encoded in a request, the URI of
the SOAP Action MUST be the same as the one specified by the [action]
property.
[message id] : URI (0..1)
A URI that uniquely identifies this message in time and space. No two
messages with a distinct application intent may share a [message id]
property. A message MAY be retransmitted for any purpose including
communications failure and MAY use the same [message id] property. The
value of this property is an opaque URI whose interpretation beyond
equivalence is not defined in this specification. If a reply is expected,
this property MUST be present.
[relationship] : (URI, URI) (0..unbounded)
A pair of values that indicate how this message relates to another message.
The type of the relationship is identified by a URI. The related message is
identified by a URI that corresponds to the related message's [message id]
property. The message identifier URI may refer to a specific message, or be
the following well-known URI that means "unspecified message": http://
www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/id/unspecified
This specification has one predefined relationship type as shown in Table
3-1.
Table 3-1. Predefined [relationship] values
┌───────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│URI │Description │
├───────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│http://www.w3.org/2005/02/ │Indicates that this is a reply to the message│
│addressing/reply │identified by the URI. │
└───────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
A reply message MUST contain a [relationship] property consisting of the
predefined reply URI and the message id property of the request message.
The dispatching of incoming messages is based on two message properties: the
mandatory "destination" and "action" fields indicate the target processing
location and the verb or intent of the message respectively.
Due to the range of network technologies currently in wide-spread use (e.g.,
NAT, DHCP, firewalls), many deployments cannot assign a meaningful global URI
to a given endpoint. To allow these "anonymous" endpoints to initiate message
exchange patterns and receive replies, WS-Addressing defines the following
well-known URI for use by endpoints that cannot have a stable, resolvable URI:
http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/role/anonymous
Requests whose [reply endpoint], [source endpoint] and/or [fault endpoint] use
this address MUST provide some out-of-band mechanism for delivering replies or
faults (e.g. returning the reply on the same transport connection). This
mechanism may be a simple request/reply transport protocol (e.g., HTTP GET or
POST). This URI MAY be used as the [destination] for reply messages and SHOULD
NOT be used as the [destination] in other circumstances.
3.1 XML Infoset Representation of Message Addressing Properties
Message addressing properties provide end-to-end characteristics of a message
that can be easily secured as a unit. These properties are immutable and not
intended to be modified along a message path.
The following describes the XML Infoset representation of message addressing
properties:
Example 3-1. XML Infoset representation of message addressing properties.
xs:anyURI
xs:anyURI
xs:anyURI
xs:anyURI
endpoint-reference
endpoint-reference
endpoint-reference
The following describes the attributes and elements listed in the schema
overview above:
/wsa:MessageID
This OPTIONAL element (of type xs:anyURI) conveys the [message id]
property. This element MUST be present if wsa:ReplyTo or wsa:FaultTo is
present.
/wsa:RelatesTo
This OPTIONAL (repeating) element information item contributes one abstract
[relationship] property value, in the form of a (URI, URI) pair. The
[children] property of this element (which is of type xs:anyURI) conveys
the [message id] of the related message. This element MUST be present if
the message is a reply.
/wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType
This OPTIONAL attribute (of type xs:anyURI) conveys the relationship type
as a URI. When absent, the implied value of this attribute is http://
www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/reply.
/wsa:ReplyTo
This OPTIONAL element (of type wsa:EndpointReferenceType) provides the
value for the [reply endpoint] property. This element MUST be present if a
reply is expected. If this element is present, wsa:MessageID MUST be
present.
/wsa:From
This OPTIONAL element (of type wsa:EndpointReferenceType) provides the
value for the [source endpoint] property.
/wsa:FaultTo
This OPTIONAL element (of type wsa:EndpointReferenceType) provides the
value for the [fault endpoint] property. If this element is present,
wsa:MessageID MUST be present.
/wsa:To
This OPTIONAL element (of type xs:anyURI) provides the value for the
[destination] property. If this element is NOT present then the value of
the [destination] property is "http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/role/
anonymous". Otherwise the [children] of this element convey the value of
this property.
/wsa:Action
This REQUIRED element of type xs:anyURI conveys the [action] property. The
[children] of this element convey the value of this property.
3.2 Formulating a Reply Message
The reply to a WS-Addressing compliant request message MUST be compliant to
WS-Addressing and be constructed according to the rules defined in this
section.
The following example illustrates a request message using message information
header blocks in a SOAP 1.2 message:
Example 3-2. Example request message.
http://example.com/someuniquestring
http://example.com/business/client1
mailto:fabrikam@example.com
http://example.com/fabrikam/mail/Delete
42
This message would have the following property values:
[destination] The URI mailto:fabrikam@example.com
[reply endpoint] The endpoint with [address] http://example.com/business/
client1
[action] http://example.com/fabrikam/mail/Delete
[message id] http://example.com/someuniquestring
The following example illustrates a reply message using message information
header blocks in a SOAP 1.2 message:
Example 3-3. Example response message.
http://example.com/someotheruniquestring
http://example.com/someuniquestring
http://example.com/business/client1
http://example.com/fabrikam/mail/DeleteAck
This message would have the following property values:
[destination] http://example.com/business/client1
[action] http://example.com/fabrikam/mail/DeleteAck
[message id] http://example.com/someotheruniquestring
[relationship] (wsa:Reply, http://example.com/someuniquestring)
4. References
[WS-Addressing-SOAP]
Web Services Addressing 1.0 - SOAP Binding, M. Gudgin, M. Hadley, Editors.
[WS-Addressing-WSDL]
Web Services Addressing 1.0 - WSDL Binding, M. Gudgin, M. Hadley, Editors.
[WSDL 2.0]
Web Services Description Language 2.0, R. Chinnici, M. Gudgin, J. J.
Moreau, J. Schlimmer, S. Weerawarana, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 3
August 2004. This version of the WSDL 2.0 specification is http://
www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803. The latest version of WSDL 2.0 is
available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20.
[IETF RFC 2119]
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels, S. Bradner,
Author. Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1999. Available at http://
www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt.
[RFC 3986]
T. Berners-Lee, et al, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic
Syntax,", W3C/MIT, January 2005. (See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt.)
[XML 1.0]
Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition), T. Bray, J. Paoli,
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, and E. Maler, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium,
10 February 1998, revised 6 October 2000. This version of the XML 1.0
Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006. The latest
version of XML 1.0 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.
[XML Namespaces]
Namespaces in XML, T. Bray, D. Hollander, and A. Layman, Editors. World
Wide Web Consortium, 14 January 1999. This version of the XML Information
Set Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114. The
latest version of Namespaces in XML is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/
REC-xml-names.
[XML Information Set]
XML Information Set, J. Cowan and R. Tobin, Editors. World Wide Web
Consortium, 24 October 2001. This version of the XML Information Set
Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-infoset-20011024. The
latest version of XML Information Set is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/
xml-infoset.
[XML Schema Structures]
XML Schema Part 1: Structures, H. Thompson, D. Beech, M. Maloney, and N.
Mendelsohn, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 2 May 2001. This version of
the XML Schema Part 1 Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/
REC-xmlschema-1-20010502. The latest version of XML Schema Part 1 is
available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1.
[XML Schema Datatypes]
XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, P. Byron and A. Malhotra, Editors. World Wide
Web Consortium, 2 May 2001. This version of the XML Schema Part 2
Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502. The
latest version of XML Schema Part 2 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/
xmlschema-2.
[SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework]
SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework, M. Gudgin, M. Hadley, N.
Mendelsohn, J-J. Moreau, H. Frystyk Nielsen, Editors. World Wide Web
Consortium, 24 June 2003. This version of the "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1:
Messaging Framework" Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/
REC-soap12-part1-20030624/. The latest version of "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1:
Messaging Framework" is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/.
[WSDL 1.1]
E. Christensen, et al, Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, March
2001.
[WS-Security]
OASIS, Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security, March 2004.
A. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
This document is the work of the W3C Web Service Addressing Working Group.
Members of the Working Group are (at the time of writing, and by alphabetical
order): Abbie Barbir (Nortel Networks), Rebecca Bergersen (IONA Technologies,
Inc.), Andreas Bjärlestam (ERICSSON), Ugo Corda (SeeBeyond Technology
Corporation), Francisco Curbera (IBM Corporation), Glen Daniels (Sonic
Software), Paul Downey (BT), Jacques Durand (Fujitsu Limited), Michael Eder
(Nokia), Robert Freund (Hitachi, Ltd.), Yaron Goland (BEA Systems, Inc.),
Martin Gudgin (Microsoft Corporation), Arun Gupta (Sun Microsystems, Inc.),
Hugo Haas (W3C/ERCIM), Marc Hadley (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), David Hull (TIBCO
Software, Inc.), Yin-Leng Husband (HP), Anish Karmarkar (Oracle Corporation),
Paul Knight (Nortel Networks), Philippe Le Hégaret (W3C/MIT), Mark Little
(Arjuna Technologies Ltd.), Jonathan Marsh (Microsoft Corporation), Jeff
Mischkinsky (Oracle Corporation), Nilo Mitra (ERICSSON), Eisaku Nishiyama
(Hitachi, Ltd.), Mark Nottingham (BEA Systems, Inc.), Ales Novy (Systinet
Inc.), David Orchard (BEA Systems, Inc.), Mark Peel (Novell, Inc.), Harris
Reynolds (webMethods, Inc.), Tony Rogers (Computer Associates), Tom Rutt
(Fujitsu Limited), Rich Salz (DataPower Technology, Inc.), Davanum Srinivas
(Computer Associates), Jiri Tejkl (Systinet Inc.), Greg Truty (IBM
Corporation), Steve Vinoski (IONA Technologies, Inc.), Pete Wenzel (SeeBeyond
Technology Corporation), Steve Winkler (SAP AG), Ümit Yalçınalp (SAP AG).
Previous members of the Working Group were: @@@.
The people who have contributed to discussions on public-ws-addressing@w3.org
are also gratefully acknowledged.
B. Change Log (Non-Normative)
B.1 Changes Since First Working Draft
┌──────────┬───────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Date │Editor │ Description │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2005-01-23│mgudgin│Incorporated resolution of issue i014; edits to Section │
│@ 21:13 │ │2.3 │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2005-01-23│mgudgin│Incorporated resolution of issue i006; made wsa:To │
│@ 20:52 │ │optional │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2005-01-23│mgudgin│Incorporated resolution of Issue i001 by removing │
│@ 19:32 │ │Reference Properties │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2005-01-17│mgudgin│Incorporated Paco's proposal for resolving Issue 038 │
│@ 02:13 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2005-01-16│mgudgin│s/PortType/InterfaceName in certain examples │
│@ 22:40 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-12-17│mhadley│Improved readability of introduction │
│@ 16:08 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-12-16│mhadley│Added resolution to issue 19 - WSDL version neutrality │
│@ 18:20 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-12-16│mhadley│Added issue 33 resolution │
│@ 16:50 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-12-14│mhadley│Switched back to edcopy formatting │
│@ 20:10 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │ │Enhanced auto-changelog generation to allow specification │
│2004-12-14│mhadley│of data ranges for logs. Split change log to show changes │
│@ 20:02 │ │between early draft and first working draft and changes │
│ │ │since first working draft. │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-12-14│ │Added resolutions for issues 12 (EPR lifecycle), 37 │
│@ 18:13 │mhadley│(relationship from QName to URI) and 39 (spec name │
│ │ │versioning) │
└──────────┴───────┴──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
B.2 Changes Since Submission
┌──────────┬───────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Date │Editor │ Description │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-11-23│ │Updated titles of examples. Fixed table formatting and │
│@ 21:38 │mhadley│references. Replaced uuid URIs with http URIs in examples.│
│ │ │Added document status. │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-11-22│mhadley│Removed reference to WS-Policy │
│@ 15:40 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-11-15│mhadley│Fixed some inter and intra spec references. │
│@ 19:43 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-11-12│mgudgin│Removed TBD sections │
│@ 21:19 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-11-11│mgudgin│Added some TBD sections │
│@ 18:31 │ │ │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │ │Second more detailed run through to separate core, SOAP │
│2004-11-07│mhadley│and WSDL document contents. Removed dependency on │
│@ 02:03 │ │WS-Policy. Removed references to WS-Trust and │
│ │ │WS-SecurityPolicy │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-11-02│mhadley│Removed static change log and added dynamically generated │
│@ 22:25 │ │change log from cvs. │
├──────────┼───────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│2004-10-28│mhadley│Initial cut of separating specification into core, soap │
│@ 17:05 │ │and wsdl │
└──────────┴───────┴──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘