Edit ISSUE-40: Should the <length> <length> offset be optional in a shadow?





Raised By:


Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. [Publish] [css-position] Publish CSS Positioned Layout Working Draft (from Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com on 2015-01-12) (from Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com on 2015-01-12)
  2. [css3-background] Issues and Proposed Resolutions (from fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net on 2008-05-13) (from fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net on 2008-05-13)
  3. ISSUE-40 (box-shadow grammar): Should the <length> <length> offset be optional in a shadow? [CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-05-07) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-05-07)

Related notes:

non-zero default offsets rejected: nobody likes this idea and it's inconsistent with text-shadow

Elika Etemad, 12 May 2008, 21:12:50

making optional offsets rejected, issue open for grammar errors fix

Elika Etemad, 12 May 2008, 21:19:57

Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, Rossen Atanassov <ratan@microsoft.com>, Chairs, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $