ACTION-6: Setup workflow for 'sheparding' User Stories from WG (github)

I started draft of a document based on equivalent one from LDP WG
( http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp-ucr/ )

Github repository: https://github.com/w3c-social/soc-ucr
Preview: http://w3c-social.github.io/soc-ucr/

We start from wiki page with 'sorted' links to stories
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/Sorting_user_stories

I already included in a draft ones from 'Entirely Positive' section. Now we start picking stories from 'Minor Objections'. Everyone can pick 1-2 of them and create Issue for it in https://github.com/w3c-social/soc-ucr/issues
Please send me over p.m your github handles so I can add you to w3c-social organization. This way you can assign yourself to issues your created, manage labels etc.

I recommend github since it provides most practical venue where WG and IG participants can collaborate with dealing with mailing lists and W3C tracker permissions. Also members representing IndieWebCamp don't participate in mailing lists and it looks like biggest number of objections comes from them.

Please see issue for story 'Profile Management' as an example
https://github.com/w3c-social/soc-ucr/issues/1

1. It links to original story in a wiki and @mention of author
2. It has comment @mentioning people involved in objection(s) and clarifying them
3. Once we manage to find resolution we will send them in bundles to WG so that everyone who +1 original story can possibly object to modified verion.