(Message HTTP-TOEDIT:560) Return-Path: masinter@parc.xerox.com Received: by zorch.w3.org; id AA16699; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 01:00:44 -0500 Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by www10.w3.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA13025 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 01:00:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from palimpsest.parc.xerox.com ([13.1.101.126]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <16036(1)>; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 22:00:42 PST Received: from palimpsest ([127.0.0.1]) by palimpsest.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <242>; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 22:00:37 PDT Sender: masinter@parc.xerox.com Message-Id: <33191784.7C4F@parc.xerox.com> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 21:00:36 PST From: Larry Masinter Organization: Xerox PARC X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: jg@w3.org Subject: docking digest at draft? Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------5FB2571F326" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------5FB2571F326 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Don't you think we should "dock" digest authentication when we go to draft standard? Else we need an errata for RFC 2069 too. --------------5FB2571F326 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from alpha.xerox.com ([13.1.64.93]) by casablanca.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <72019>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 13:39:07 PST Received: from hplb.hpl.hp.com ([15.255.59.2]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <17090(6)>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 13:38:40 PST Received: from cuckoo.hpl.hp.com by hplb.hpl.hp.com; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 21:28:51 GMT Received: by cuckoo.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.16/15.6+ISC) id AA210150921; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 21:28:41 GMT Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 13:28:41 PST To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com Resent-To: Resent-To: Resent-To: Resent-To: Subject: HTTP 1.1 errata Internet Draft? Sender: Larry Masinter From: Larry Masinter Message-Id: <96Dec19.130446pdt."150"@palimpsest.parc.xerox.com> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 12:04:46 PST Resent-Message-Id: <"o6_GU1.0.I85.9ERko"@cuckoo> Resent-From: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2123 X-Loop: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: http-wg-request@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com PL> 1. Change section 2.1.3 "The AuthenticationInfo Header" to say that it PL> is allowed in the footer of a chunked encoded HTTP message. I was going to maintain a web page of errata for HTTP/1.1, but I was wondering if it might be better to document this in the Internet standard way. We're asking for separate Internet Drafts for major changes. Volunteers? --------------5FB2571F326--