Scribe: Christine
Pete: May be brief meeting due to unexpected issues
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/
This module contains the features of CSS for conditional processing of parts of style sheets, conditioned on capabilities of the processor or the document to which the style sheet is being applied.
The main extensions compared to CSS level 2 are allowing nesting of certain at-rules inside@media (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#at-ruledef-media), and the addition of the@supports (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#at-ruledef-supports) rule for conditional processing.
The specification has been at CR since 2013:
but due to the long interval since that time, CSS WG is restarting wide review before publishing a Candidate Recommendation Snapshot.
The WG advises that the specification is widely implemented.
They expect to meet the CR exit requirements in the next few months.
Privacy and security considerations section: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#priv-sec
Answers to the Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy: w3c/csswg-drafts#5567
Changes since 2013 CR: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#changes
The WG has advised that they would prefer responses and discussion to happen on that issue, but they have invited us to open other issues on that GitHub for any substantive issues discovered.
Pete: Assigned to Jeffrey, not available to discuss right now, so we move to next call.
Spec: https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/
This is an incremental update to WebAuthn Level 1 - https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/REC-webauthn-1-20190304/
WG reported substantive changes since Rec:
Privacy Considerations: https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn-2/#sctn-privacy-considerations
The WG welcomes comments on github - https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues
Pete: Assigned to Pranjal. Large spec. Needs more time and more eyes to review. Pranjal would appreciate someone to tag-team with him on this. Volunteers? If not, I can help him.
(no volunteers during call)
Specification: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria/2020-09_CR/index.html
The specification provides a framework to improve the accessibility and interoperability of web content and applications.
Changes since ARIA 1.1 : https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria/2020-09_CR/index.html#substantive-changes-since-the-last-public-working-draft
The WG reports that changes mostly consist of the addition of roles to get closer to parity with HTML to allow the creation of accessible Web components.
This specification is in the “almost CR” stage of development, so the WG expects it to transition, in more or less its current form, after completing horizontal review.
The WG reports that they “do not have a privacy and security section as there was no content to add”.
Answers to the Self-review: Security and Privacy Questionnaire: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/2020OctDec/0024.html
They have asked that we raise any issues in the ARIA GitHub repo: https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues
Pete: Next person on the review list is Nick. Is anyone familiar with the spec able to take on the review? Nick?
Nick: Depends on the timeline. I don’t have a lot of time to do a review now, but I can do early next year.
Pete: We will discuss offline and if time does not work, we will assign someone else from the list.
Specification: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/
The CSS module defines the various sizing properties and concepts used throughout CSS.
New features since CSS2 are summarized in https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/#changes-3
The WG advised that the specification is in the “almost CR” stage of development, so they expect it to transition, in more or less its current form, after completing horizontal review.
Privacy and Security Considerations section: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/#priv-sec
Answers to Self-review: Security and Privacy Questionnaire: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/2020OctDec/0021.html
The WG has asked that we raise any issues in the csswg GitHub repo: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues
Pete: Small spec. Anyone interested in taking on the review, and perhaps also the next one?
(no volunteers)
Pete: We put out call on Slack and if not takers, we will go down the list of reviewers.
Specification: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-box-3/
The specification describes the margin and padding properties, which create spacing in and around a CSS box, and defines a bunch of terminology used throughout the CSS layout specs.
Changes since CSS2 are summarized in: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-box-3/#changes and basically consist of
There are no new features.
The WG advises that it is really just a redrafting of a very basic piece of CSS2.
(See re: 2 above)
Christine: Spoke to Nick about publishing the permissions blog post as a Group Note, and work with the TAG.
(npd: I think TAG was looking both for this as a standalone document, and then some additions to their design principles doc, a couple of questions and then a reference. So hopefully we can collaborate with them on both parts of that.)
Christine: yes! (TBD)
No AOB