Brief   Full   Jump  

Small
Medium
Large

Teal
High contrast
Bluish
Black

Sans-serif
Serif
Monospaced
Close
d
?
Styles

[css-values][css-transforms][css-motion][css-background] Updated

3 messages.

[css-values][css-transforms][css-motion][css-background] Updated
fantasai   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:58:28 -0700

www-style > March 2017 > 0054.html

Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 19:59:09 UTC

Show in list: by dateby threadby subjectby author

Link to this message in this page.

Sent to: www-style@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, public-fx@w3.org, public-fx@w3.org.

Tab and I just pushed the changes to drop the 3-value syntax from <position> per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html The canonical reference is now (again) in CSS Values and Units 3. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#position This implies changes to object-position, mask-position, radial gradients, and offset-position. It also makes <position> available for use in transform-origin and perspective-origin. (Note, if implementers want us to also drop from background-position, I'm sure the CSSWG could consider that as well if presented with compelling Web-compat data indicating no problems... but we've otherwise special-cased background-position as superset syntax that includes the 3-value clauses.) We would like to request A. Review of the altered syntax definition. and subject to approval of A, B. Republication of css-values-3. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#changes C. Republication of css-backgrounds-3. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#changes-2014-09 D. Republication of motion-1 (which is soooooo overdue for publication). https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion/ vs https://www.w3.org/TR/motion-1/ E. Pending Transform edits and state of general coherence, republication of Transforms. Thanks~ ~fantasai and TJ
Re: [css-values][css-transforms][css-motion][css-background] Updated
Simon Fraser   Tue, 02 May 2017 13:22:40 -0700

www-style > May 2017 > 0003.html

Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2017 20:23:17 UTC

Show in list: by dateby threadby subjectby author

Link to this message in this page.

Sent to: fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net
Copied to: www-style@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, public-fx@w3.org, public-fx@w3.org.

> On Mar 15, 2017, at 12:58 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > Tab and I just pushed the changes to drop the 3-value syntax from <position> per > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html > The canonical reference is now (again) in CSS Values and Units 3. > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#position > > This implies changes to object-position, mask-position, radial gradients, > and offset-position. It also makes <position> available for use in > transform-origin and perspective-origin. > > (Note, if implementers want us to also drop from background-position, I'm sure the > CSSWG could consider that as well if presented with compelling Web-compat data > indicating no problems... but we've otherwise special-cased background-position as > superset syntax that includes the 3-value clauses.) > > We would like to request > > A. Review of the altered syntax definition. > and subject to approval of A, > B. Republication of css-values-3. > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#changes > C. Republication of css-backgrounds-3. > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#changes-2014-09 > D. Republication of motion-1 (which is soooooo overdue for publication). > https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion/ vs https://www.w3.org/TR/motion-1/ > E. Pending Transform edits and state of general coherence, republication of Transforms. I have reviewed the new syntax and it looks reasonable as the basis for transform-origin, and in perspective-origin. Simon
Re: [css-values][css-transforms][css-motion][css-background] Updated
Eric Willigers   Thu, 25 May 2017 06:56:03 +1000

www-style > May 2017 > 0058.html

Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 12:16:36 UTC

Show in list: by dateby threadby subjectby author

Link to this message in this page.

Sent to: smfr@me.com
Copied to: fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net, www-style@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, public-fx@w3.org, public-fx@w3.org.

I have added use counters to Blink, so we will learn in three months how often 3-value positions are currently being used in object-position, basic shapes, gradients and also background-position and perspective-origin. On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2017, at 12:58 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> > wrote: > > > > Tab and I just pushed the changes to drop the 3-value syntax from > <position> per > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html > > The canonical reference is now (again) in CSS Values and Units 3. > > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#position > > > > This implies changes to object-position, mask-position, radial gradients, > > and offset-position. It also makes <position> available for use in > > transform-origin and perspective-origin. > > > > (Note, if implementers want us to also drop from background-position, > I'm sure the > > CSSWG could consider that as well if presented with compelling > Web-compat data > > indicating no problems... but we've otherwise special-cased > background-position as > > superset syntax that includes the 3-value clauses.) > > > > We would like to request > > > > A. Review of the altered syntax definition. > > and subject to approval of A, > > B. Republication of css-values-3. > > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#changes > > C. Republication of css-backgrounds-3. > > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#changes-2014-09 > > D. Republication of motion-1 (which is soooooo overdue for publication). > > https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion/ vs https://www.w3.org/TR/motion-1/ > > E. Pending Transform edits and state of general coherence, republication > of Transforms. > > I have reviewed the new syntax and it looks reasonable as the basis for > transform-origin, and in perspective-origin. > > Simon > > >