Brief   Full   Jump  

Small
Medium
Large

Teal
High contrast
Bluish
Black

Sans-serif
Serif
Monospaced
Close
d
?
Styles

I18N-ISSUE-341

4 messages.

I18N-ISSUE-341: [css3-background] border-left-* and border-right-* [CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders]
"Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker"   Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:55:04 +0000

www-style > February 2014 > 0000.html

Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 21:55:08 UTC

Show in list: by dateby threadby subjectby author

Link to this message in this page.

Sent to: www-style@w3.org, www-international@w3.org.

I18N-ISSUE-341: [css3-background] border-left-* and border-right-* [CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders] http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/341 Raised by: Addison Phillips On product: CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders Document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css3-background-20140204/ Section 4. Similar to I18N-ISSUE-340, should there be a border-start-* and border-end-* set of keywords, allowing one to control the leading/trailing edge of borders dependent on the container direction? This issued was discussed by I18N WG here: http://www.w3.org/2014/02/20-i18n-minutes.html#item04
Re: I18N-ISSUE-341: [css3-background] border-left-* and border-right-* [CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders]
fantasai   Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:20:25 -0800

www-style > February 2014 > 0000.html

Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 23:20:53 UTC

Show in list: by dateby threadby subjectby author

Link to this message in this page.

Sent to: www-style@w3.org.

On 02/20/2014 01:55 PM, Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > I18N-ISSUE-341: [css3-background] border-left-* and border-right-* [CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders] > > http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/341 > > Raised by: Addison Phillips > On product: CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders > > Document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css3-background-20140204/ > > Section 4. Similar to I18N-ISSUE-340, should there be a border-start-* > and border-end-* set of keywords, allowing one to control the > leading/trailing edge of borders dependent on the container direction? > > This issued was discussed by I18N WG here: http://www.w3.org/2014/02/20-i18n-minutes.html#item04 I do consider this to be an open issue and one that I'd like to resolve, but logical properties are out of scope for Backgrounds and Borders L3. Thanks for keeping the pressure on, we'll hopefully get to them! ~fantasai
Re: I18N-ISSUE-341: [css3-background] border-left-* and border-right-* [CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders]
fantasai   Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:25:32 -0800

www-style > March 2014 > 0000.html

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 03:26:02 UTC

Show in list: by dateby threadby subjectby author

Link to this message in this page.

Sent to: www-style@w3.org, www-international@w3.org.

On 02/20/2014 01:55 PM, Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > I18N-ISSUE-341: [css3-background] border-left-* and border-right-* [CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders] > > http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/341 > > Raised by: Addison Phillips > On product: CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders > > Document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css3-background-20140204/ > > Section 4. Similar to I18N-ISSUE-340, should there be a border-start-* > and border-end-* set of keywords, allowing one to control the > leading/trailing edge of borders dependent on the container direction? > > This issued was discussed by I18N WG here: http://www.w3.org/2014/02/20-i18n-minutes.html#item04 I do consider this to be an open issue and one that I'd like to resolve, but logical properties are out of scope for CSS Backgrounds and Borders Level 3, which is not accepting new features at this time. Thanks for keeping the pressure on, we'll hopefully get to them! Please let us know if this is acceptable. ~fantasai
RE: I18N-ISSUE-341: [css3-background] border-left-* and border-right-* [CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders]
"Phillips, Addison"   Thu, 6 Mar 2014 23:07:07 +0000

www-style > March 2014 > 0000.html

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:07:57 UTC

Show in list: by dateby threadby subjectby author

Link to this message in this page.

Sent to: fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net, www-style@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, www-international@w3.org.

> > On 02/20/2014 01:55 PM, Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker > wrote: > > I18N-ISSUE-341: [css3-background] border-left-* and border-right-* > > [CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders] > > > > http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/341 > > > > Raised by: Addison Phillips > > On product: CSS3-Backgrounds-and-Borders > > > > Document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css3-background-20140204/ > > > > Section 4. Similar to I18N-ISSUE-340, should there be a border-start-* > > and border-end-* set of keywords, allowing one to control the > > leading/trailing edge of borders dependent on the container direction? > > > > This issued was discussed by I18N WG here: > > http://www.w3.org/2014/02/20-i18n-minutes.html#item04 > > I do consider this to be an open issue and one that I'd like to resolve, but logical > properties are out of scope for CSS Backgrounds and Borders Level 3, which is > not accepting new features at this time. > > Thanks for keeping the pressure on, we'll hopefully get to them! > > Please let us know if this is acceptable. > The I18N WG considered your response in our teleconference this week [1]. We're not really "satisfied" by this, since CSS has long been aware of the difference between physical (left/right) and logical (start/end) keywords and the need for the logical types to support bidirectional content (generally, both are needed). We don't have a formal objection, but we hope that Style will make the extra effort to incorporate these types of features into future specifications from the start, as well as addressing these in L4. Regards (for I18N), Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126) Chair (W3C I18N WG) Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-i18n-minutes.html#item04