Difference between revisions of "Best Practice Documents"

From MultilingualWeb-LT EC Project Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* Best practice for using the LocalizationQualityIssues data categoryin relation to existing quality frameworks
 
* Best practice for using the LocalizationQualityIssues data categoryin relation to existing quality frameworks
 
** Arle Lommel
 
** Arle Lommel
* Best practice in using Provenance data category with the W3C PROV recommendations
+
* Best practice in using [[Provenance Best Practice]] data category with the W3C PROV recommendations
 
** Dave Lewis
 
** Dave Lewis
 
* Best practice in using ITS2.0 terminology and disambiguation in relation to existing terminology workflows and related external models such as NIF
 
* Best practice in using ITS2.0 terminology and disambiguation in relation to existing terminology workflows and related external models such as NIF

Revision as of 18:15, 31 January 2013

Several ITS2.0 best practice documents are under development by the working group, under the named topic champions:

  • Examination of ITS2.0 Requirements and contributed issues to establish requriements for possible further requriements for recommendation in this area
    • David Lewis, Felix Sasaki
  • Documenting the ITS/XLIFF mapping
    • David Filip, Yves Savorel, Dave Lewis
  • Documenting ITS2.0 Use Cases
  • Best practice for using the LocalizationQualityIssues data categoryin relation to existing quality frameworks
    • Arle Lommel
  • Best practice in using Provenance Best Practice data category with the W3C PROV recommendations
    • Dave Lewis
  • Best practice in using ITS2.0 terminology and disambiguation in relation to existing terminology workflows and related external models such as NIF
    • Felix Sasaki
  • Best practice in using ITS2.0 data categories with machine translation

Please contact the named champions or working group via the mailing list if you wish to propose or contribute to the formation of best practice.