Review document: https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/snapshots/2020-06-03
Editor's draft: https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/
This disposition of comments covers the issues submitted during the AC informal review period announced on 3 June 2021, which ran through 2 July 2021, and those submitted by during AC Review and Accepted by the Director.
For a more complete list of comments and issues raised since the previous edition of the process was published, please refer to Github:
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Clarify expectation of horizontal review as part of wide review From: Judy Brewer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/535#issuecomment-854121607 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/535#issuecomment-879943488 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/commit/af51456b9fbdaba7486329fd9efa8c44fcd1e9e9 Closed: Accepted
Issue 2. # Summary: Clarify that tooling must be accessible for people with disabilities From: Judy Brewer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/537 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/537#issuecomment-857879755 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/commit/0abef35f9630add41a6889d244467b530694396b Closed: Accepted
Issue 3. # Summary: Editorial tweak to AB Composition From: Philippe Le Hégaret Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/540 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/540#issuecomment-859224830 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/commit/c8e0872052b91fca0f8936f21f419e352a912a20 Closed: Accepted
Issue 4. # Summary: Ensure specs and standards have published user research From: Daniel Appelquist Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/551 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/551#issuecomment-872610856 Closed: Deferred (Out Of Scope)
Issue 5. # Summary: Archiving discussion attachments From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/552 Closed: Deferred Verified: Reporter is editor
Issue 6. # Summary: Misleading characterization of the Patent Policy From: Wendy Seltzer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/570 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/569 Closed: Accepted Verified: Director's decision
Issue 7. # Summary: Should not be possible to change Normative references of the Process without member approval From: James Rosewell Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2021Aug/0006.html Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/571 Closed: Accepted Verified: Director's decision
Issue 8. # Summary: Define how to interpret potential conflicts between the Membership Agreement, Process document and normative references From: James Rosewell Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/574 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/572 Closed: Deferred Verified: Director's Decision