998 2005-01-10 15:54:28 +0000 State that sequential lexically ordering is the default for interpretation of CDL 2005-05-17 22:05:30 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Windows 2000 CLOSED WONTFIX http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0001.html P2 normal -- 1 martin.chapman martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2808 0 martin.chapman 2005-01-10 15:54:28 +0000 The CDL specification ( Web Services ChoreographyDescription Language Version 1.0 W3C Last Call Draft 17 December 2004 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ws-cdl-10-20041217/> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ws-cdl-10-20041217/ ) should specifically state that a Choreography Description, written using CDL is to be interpreted element at a time in the sequence those elements are written down following the normal rules of XML documents (lexical ordering), except were the defined semantics of an element so encountered dictates otherwise (for instance, the parallel and choice constructs in the case of CDL). Best Regards Tony 4158 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 20:33:45 +0000 From meeting on 11-jan-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0002/2005-01- 11_WS-Chor_Notes.txt: Discussion deferred as deemed to be a technical issue. 3733 2 gritzinger 2005-04-12 20:29:51 +0000 RESOLVED WONTFIX, MINUTES 2005-04-12 3425 3 martin.chapman 2005-05-10 14:30:11 +0000 MINUTES 2005-04-12: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/chor/5/04/12-minutes.html Tony has been informed of the group's decision [1] and we are awaiting confirmation. Category changed to LCC: Closed. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005May/0006.html 3172 4 martin.chapman 2005-05-17 22:05:30 +0000 Tony has agreed to the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005May/0030.html