991 2005-01-10 04:20:45 +0000 Editorial decisions from June F2F (010) 2005-04-28 11:53:50 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified QA QASpec-GL LC-2004-11-22 All All RESOLVED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Sep/0025.html LC, SpecGL P2 normal --- 1 karl karl karl oldest_to_newest 2801 0 karl 2005-01-10 04:20:45 +0000 Glancing quickly through the QA June F2F minutes and comparing it with the QA Specification Guidelines, it appears that most of the decisions we took wrt editorial comments for SpecGL haven't been implemented in the text yet; so, one of the issues that needs to be solved before going to last call is to actually implement them. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Jun/0044.html Comment Dom has precised in an additional email the nature of the comments which have been forgotten. This mail includes: Remove the RFC Keywords. Meaningful and clear sentences for Good Practices and Principles. Why Care of section A.1. Proposal Karl has proposed the following resolutions: Todo: Remove the RFC Keywords. Meaningful and clear sentences... See Issue 11 Editorial revision of all "Why Care". See Issue 12 Closed 3668 1 dom 2005-04-28 11:53:50 +0000 setting version to LC in case of future use