<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>984</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-01-10 04:08:22 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>B3 list of normative and non-normative references</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-04-28 11:53:48 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>QA</product>
          <component>QASpec-GL</component>
          <version>LC-2004-11-22</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004Jul/0007.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>LC, SpecGL</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Karl Dubost">karl</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Karl Dubost">karl</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Karl Dubost">karl</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2794</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Karl Dubost">karl</who>
    <bug_when>2005-01-10 04:08:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>ISSUE: Björn Höhrmann has raised an important issue about the way normative references are given and 
their implications on the normativity of the specification itself. An short abstract of the issue can be 
foreseen as:


When making a normative reference, you need to see how future versions of the said specification may 
affect your own document

Address the way you &quot;use&quot; the conformance model of the referred specification



The QA WG is still discussing the issue. You are welcome to participate on the QA IG Mailing list (www-
qa@w3.org publicly archived), but read first this two mail threads:


B3 list of normative and non-normative references 
http://www.w3.org/mid/6.0.0.22.2.20040819154645.01c4e558@wsxg03.nist.gov

Björn&apos;s Issue
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004Jul/0018</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3722</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2005-04-11 11:58:21 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>RESOLVED: The WG has added a good practice on normative references, insisting on
the aspects that need consideration when making such a decision.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3641</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2005-04-28 11:53:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>setting version to LC in case of future use</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>