9836 2010-06-02 21:15:39 +0000 The working group should consider all of a response, not just the first five words, to determine its meaning. 2010-06-03 00:25:50 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG working group Decision Policy unspecified All All RESOLVED WORKSFORME P2 normal --- 1 lmm dave.null mike mjs Paul.Cotton rubys public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 35913 0 lmm 2010-06-02 21:15:39 +0000 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0027.html The decision about which objections are strong or are not strong should be working group consensus based. Even if the chairs are making this decision, the chairs should at least read the whole argument and not the first few words out of context. 35920 1 lmm 2010-06-03 00:01:02 +0000 Never mind. It would have been nice to actually had my opinion considered, but I think it's a lost cause. 35923 2 rubys 2010-06-03 00:25:50 +0000 If you are referring to your input to the WBS surveys on issues 90 and 91, then your words were most definitely read in full and considered. But since both you and Shelley have inquired on this, I've provided more detail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0035.html