9804 2010-05-25 20:54:02 +0000 "the alt attribute must be specified" so are you saying ALT is required? 2010-10-04 13:58:25 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED INVALID http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#alt a11y, a11y_text-alt P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian laura.lee.carlson mike Ms2ger public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 35827 0 contributor 2010-05-25 20:54:02 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#alt Comment: "the alt attribute must be specified" so are you saying ALT is required? Posted from: 198.204.15.125 36262 1 Ms2ger 2010-06-18 13:11:27 +0000 That's what it says. INVALID as it is a question, rather than a bug.. 36271 2 laura.lee.carlson 2010-06-19 12:35:48 +0000 This bug is indeed a phrased as question. But I don't know if I would classify 9804 as INVALID. It is more of a NEEDSINFO bug, as it needs further elaboration or clarification to identify a problem. Does the commenter need assistance with this bug? For information on how Bugzilla Bugs fits into the HTMLWG decision policy please see: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#basic-step-1 That document states: "If the commenter has difficulties filing a bug, one of the Chairs or a volunteer will assist them." 9804 seems to overlap HTMLWG Issue 31 [1] and its related bugs [2]. Would any of those address the commenter's concern? If so this may be a DUPLICATE bug. [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/31 [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Accessibility_Change_Proposal_Status#img 38305 3 cooper 2010-08-31 13:37:18 +0000 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Aug/0013.html The bug triage sub-team thinks the HTML A11Y TF does not need to formally follow this bug. Original submitters or other interested parties may choose to continue to push this issue on their own. Notes from the sub-team may follow in a separate comment.