9801 2010-05-24 01:59:33 +0000 It would be useful to mention sectioning root elements with a link to 4.4.11 here 2010-10-04 14:27:41 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#kinds-of-content P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking w3.org public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 35813 0 contributor 2010-05-24 01:59:33 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#kinds-of-content Comment: It would be useful to mention sectioning root elements with a link to 4.4.11 here Posted from: 222.147.252.201 by w3.org@boblet.net 35814 1 w3.org 2010-05-24 02:01:53 +0000 I’m thinking for completeness, even if sectioning root elements don’t qualify as a broad category of content. I don’t think they’re necessary to add to the diagram. 37874 2 ian 2010-08-25 23:07:13 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: The section on sectioning content links to sectioning roots, but I don't really see sectioning roots as relevant to the section on content models proper.