9774 2010-05-20 09:13:57 +0000 "consecutive lines displayed below each other" - since subtitles tend to be rendered at the bottom, it's actually better for new subtitles to be rendered higher up. Of course, the individual lines of each subtitle still extend downwards, but it's still po 2012-07-18 18:42:02 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other VERIFIED INVALID http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#timed-track-model a11y, a11ytf, media P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor jfoliot astrange+w3 ian laura.lee.carlson mike Ms2ger philipj public-html-a11y public-html-admin silviapfeiffer1 w3c contributor oldest_to_newest 35772 0 contributor 2010-05-20 09:13:57 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#timed-track-model Comment: "consecutive lines displayed below each other" - since subtitles tend to be rendered at the bottom, it's actually better for new subtitles to be rendered higher up. Of course, the individual lines of each subtitle still extend downwards, but it's still possibly better to say "after each other". Posted from: 184.36.82.183 39354 1 ian 2010-09-25 15:54:43 +0000 The text "consecutive lines displayed below each other" is talking about the writing direction, not subtitles. We can't use "after" since this is _defining_ the word "after". (e.g. writing on roadways in English-speaking countries is written left-to-right bottom-to-top, with subsequent lines appearing "after" each other being above each other, not below.) 42908 2 w3c 2010-11-30 16:49:34 +0000 Assigning the bug to John Foliot for discussion in the Media Sub-Team