9646 2010-05-03 10:32:38 +0000 Clean up the DTD - e.g. remove reference to Strict and Transtitional 2011-08-04 05:06:11 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) unspecified PC All CLOSED FIXED http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/#the-html-4.01---rdfa-1.1-dtd P3 normal LC 1 xn--mlform-iua msporny mike msporny public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking xn--mlform-iua public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 35373 0 xn--mlform-iua 2010-05-03 10:32:38 +0000 A 'HTML4+RDFa' is great. But, please make some more edits of the DTD. E.g. strike this text from it: ]] Authors should use the Strict DTD when possible, but may use the Transitional DTD when support for presentation attribute and elements is required. [[ PS: To have a 'HTML5+RDFa' DTD would be even greater, see Maciej's comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0728.html 35374 1 xn--mlform-iua 2010-05-03 10:44:41 +0000 May be it would be good to make clear that this is a transitional doctype, w.r.t. content, but strict w.r.t. rendering mode. 35440 2 msporny 2010-05-05 03:40:56 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Fixed Change Description: Removed offending text, made it clear that the DTD is Transitional wrt to content, but Strict wrt rendering mode: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100504/DTD/html401-rdfa11-1.dtd.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&f=h Rationale: I don't quite grok the request, but the submitter seems to know more about the nuances than I do and a change to the text doesn't seem like it would harm anything. 44547 3 xn--mlform-iua 2011-01-21 07:04:41 +0000 Satisfied. 53037 4 mike 2011-08-04 05:06:11 +0000 mass-move component to LC1