960 2004-12-20 10:11:00 +0000 Notation/Psuedo Schema 2005-05-10 13:56:17 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Closed unspecified Other other CLOSED WONTFIX http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2004Dec/0000.html P2 normal -- 1 martin.chapman martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2694 0 martin.chapman 2004-12-20 10:11:00 +0000 From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Please do not invent yet another notation to define (or describe?) the language elements, I encourage the Working Group to adobt the notation in the XSLT 1.0 Recommendation, <http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt>. It is more widely known, quite compatible to the current ad-hoc style, and in my experience one of the best notations. Also, there are many instances of this ad-hoc notation in the specification that seem wrong, for example, section 2.5.5 has silentAction roleType="qname? /> which seems to lack a quote mark. Another problem is that e.g. "qname" does not seem to be defined for this "informal" notation, it is thus not well-defined whether this refers to the literal "qname" or a specific non-terminal defined elsewhere. 4141 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 20:14:55 +0000 From meeting on 11-jan-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0002/2005-01- 11_WS-Chor_Notes.txt: Close without fixing has the notation we have used is in WSDL and several OASIS XML specifications. It draws from XML DTD practice and is in relatively commonly used and is self explanatory. It seems the more self-explanatory than the alternative offered. 3420 2 martin.chapman 2005-05-10 13:56:17 +0000 Bjoern has been informed of the group's decision [1] and we are awaiting confirmation. Category changed to LCC: Closed. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005May/0002.html