959 2004-12-20 10:08:49 +0000 Namespace name 2005-05-10 13:45:35 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Closed unspecified Other other CLOSED WONTFIX http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2004Dec/0000.html P2 normal -- 1 martin.chapman martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2693 0 martin.chapman 2004-12-20 10:08:49 +0000 From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> The document proposes http://www.w3.org/2004/12/ws-chor/cdl as namespace name for the language, the name is inconsistent with many other W3C namespace names, e.g. * http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml * http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink * http://www.w3.org/2000/svg * http://www.w3.org/2001/vxml * http://www.w3.org/2001/xml-events * http://www.w3.org/2002/xforms * http://www.w3.org/2004/xbl * ... Please change the namespace to be consistent with these namespace names, which will also make the namespace name much easier to use. A possible name would be * http://www.w3.org/2005/cdl 4140 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 20:13:41 +0000 From meeting on 11-jan-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0002/2005-01- 11_WS-Chor_Notes.txt: Reject as other specifications are using the same format as we have used, compare for instance WSDL. Also this is more of a recommendation stage issue. Resolved WONTFIX 3419 2 martin.chapman 2005-05-10 13:45:35 +0000 Bjoern has been informed of the group's decision [1] and we are awaiting confirmation. Category changed to LCC: Closed. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005May/0000.html