9588 2010-04-23 23:01:48 +0000 All: Changes to definition of term 'generate' 2015-06-20 16:34:56 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Resource Access All PR All All CLOSED REMIND P2 normal --- 1 ram.jeyaraman public-ws-resource-access-notifications dug public-ws-resource-access-notifications oldest_to_newest 35236 0 ram.jeyaraman 2010-04-23 23:01:48 +0000 All the WS-RA specs define the term "generate" as follows [1]. I like to suggest two changes as proposed in [2]: 1. Editorial spelling - Change "futher" to "further". 2. The term "MAY NOT" is not generally used. I have suggested a different phrase. Both the changes are highlighted within **. [1] The term "generate" is used in relation to the various faults defined by this specification to imply that a fault is produced and no futher processing SHOULD be performed. In these cases the fault SHOULD be transmitted. However, there might be reasons when a compliant implementation can choose not to transmit the fault - for example, security concerns - in these situations the fault MAY NOT be transmitted. [2] The term "generate" is used in relation to the various faults defined by this specification to imply that a fault is produced and no *further* processing SHOULD be performed. In these cases the fault SHOULD be transmitted. However, there might be reasons when a compliant implementation can choose not to transmit the fault - for example, security concerns - in these situations the *service MAY choose not to transmit the fault*. 35449 1 bob 2010-05-05 13:04:17 +0000 2010-05-04 resolved as proposed 121260 2 jackiewindsor09 2015-06-20 16:34:05 +0000 Please make my changes 121340 3 jackiewindsor09 2015-06-20 16:34:56 +0000 Please make my changes