9515 2010-04-14 12:14:40 +0000 Allow <noscript> element as child element of <head> element 2010-10-04 14:47:45 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified PC Windows 2000 RESOLVED WORKSFORME P2 normal --- 1 brille1 ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 35022 0 brille1 2010-04-14 12:14:40 +0000 I have read about several scenarios requiring a different set of style sheets when script is disabled or not available at a UA. Currently, <script> is allowed as a child element of <head>, but this is not true for the <noscript> element. (Although a couple of browser vendors yet support the <noscript> tag in the <head> section of a HTML page.) I suggest to add the <noscript> element to the list of child elements allowed on the <head> element. 35026 1 zcorpan 2010-04-14 13:31:24 +0000 It already is allowed in head: Contexts in which this element may be used: In a head element of an HTML document, if there are no ancestor noscript elements. Where phrasing content is expected in HTML documents, if there are no ancestor noscript elements. 35483 2 brille1 2010-05-07 03:03:23 +0000 I can't find a DTD in the HTML5 spec, neither can I find your comment there. Where is it written? From the HTML4.01 DTD I can tell that <noscript> is not allowed: <!ENTITY % head.misc "SCRIPT|STYLE|META|LINK|OBJECT" -- repeatable head elements --> 35485 3 mike 2010-05-07 03:11:57 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > I can't find a DTD in the HTML5 spec, neither can I find your comment there. > Where is it written? http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/semantics.html#the-noscript-element See the "Contexts in which this element may be used" section there (which is Simon quoted from in comment 1). 35492 4 brille1 2010-05-07 03:43:29 +0000 OK, found it... I see now. Thanks!