9431 2010-04-06 12:14:56 +0000 I believe that the link type "tag" should follow the same applicability as the author link type - i.e. nearest article parent / page as whole otherwise. It would also be consistent with the already used rel-tag microformat. http://microformats.org/wiki/re 2010-10-04 14:45:24 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other CLOSED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#link-type-tag P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian jhominal mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 34594 0 contributor 2010-04-06 12:14:56 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#link-type-tag Comment: I believe that the link type "tag" should follow the same applicability as the author link type - i.e. nearest article parent / page as whole otherwise. It would also be consistent with the already used rel-tag microformat. http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag Posted from: 87.91.57.138 34847 1 ian 2010-04-13 01:22:15 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: The only implementations I could find of rel-tag consumers all worked at the page level, not the section level. 35019 2 jhominal 2010-04-14 10:16:30 +0000 After some research, I have come to the conclusion that the only confusion is one of wording - that I thought that the rel="tag" attribute could only be applied if the tag in question concerned the entirety of the page. Thank you for your consideration.