9409 2010-04-05 12:26:48 +0000 Spec that the last 'default-style' (whether http-equiv or http) takes precedence 2010-10-04 14:57:21 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified All All RESOLVED WONTFIX http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/semantics.html#attr-meta-http-equiv-default-style P2 normal LC 1 xn--mlform-iua ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking xn--mlform-iua public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 34538 0 xn--mlform-iua 2010-04-05 12:26:48 +0000 The spec now says: ]] Default style state (http-equiv="default-style") This pragma sets the name of the default alternative style sheet set. If the meta element has no content attribute, or if that attribute's value is the empty string, then abort these steps. Set the preferred style sheet set to the value of the element's content attribute. [CSSOM] [[ Please adobt what HTML4 says - namely, that the last META declaration and/or HTTP header takes presdence. http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/present/styles#h-14.3.2 ]] If two or more META declarations or HTTP headers specify the preferred style sheet, the last one takes precedence. HTTP headers are considered to occur earlier than the document HEAD for this purpose. [[ 34612 1 xn--mlform-iua 2010-04-06 17:51:32 +0000 A test of how UAs react to META default-style declaration when its value is the empty string: http://www.malform.no/testing/html5/content-language-empty-string/ 34849 2 ian 2010-04-13 01:24:59 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: This is an intended simplification. There is minimal content using this so it doesn't much matter if we change the way duplicates are handled. (They're invalid now anyway.)